IX General Population and Housing Census 1970 - IPUMS Subset
Mexico, 1970
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MEX_1970_PHC_v01_M_v03_A_IPUMS
Producer(s)
Dirección General de Estadística, Secretaría de Industria y Comercio, Minnesota Population Center
Created on
Sep 29, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
13347
Downloads
2867
- Data files
- MEX1970-H-H
- MEX1970-P-H
Subfamily income (INCSFAM)
Data file: MEX1970-P-H
Overview
Valid:
0
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
151
End:
152
Width:
2
Range:
-
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| 0 | NIU (not in universe) |
| 1 | 0-49 pesos |
| 2 | 50-99 pesos |
| 3 | 100-149 pesos |
| 4 | 150-199 pesos |
| 5 | 200-249 pesos |
| 6 | 250-299 pesos |
| 7 | 300-349 pesos |
| 8 | 350-399 pesos |
| 9 | 400-449 pesos |
| 10 | 450-499 pesos |
| 11 | 500-599 pesos |
| 12 | 600-699 pesos |
| 13 | 700-799 pesos |
| 14 | 800-899 pesos |
| 15 | 900-999 pesos |
| 16 | 1,000-1,099 pesos |
| 17 | 1,100-1,199 pesos |
| 18 | 1,200-1,299 pesos |
| 19 | 1,300-1,399 pesos |
| 20 | 1,400-1,499 pesos |
| 21 | 1,500-1,599 pesos |
| 22 | 1,600-1,699 pesos |
| 23 | 1,700-1,799 pesos |
| 24 | 1,800-1,899 pesos |
| 25 | 1,900-1,999 pesos |
| 26 | 2,000-2,099 pesos |
| 27 | 2,100-2,199 pesos |
| 28 | 2,200-2,299 pesos |
| 29 | 2,300-2,399 pesos |
| 30 | 2,400-2,499 pesos |
| 31 | 2,500-2,749 pesos |
| 32 | 2,750-2,999 pesos |
| 33 | 3,000-3,249 pesos |
| 34 | 3,250-3,499 pesos |
| 35 | 3,500-3,749 pesos |
| 36 | 3,750-3,999 pesos |
| 37 | 4,000-4,249 pesos |
| 38 | 4,250-4,499 pesos |
| 39 | 4,500-4,749 pesos |
| 40 | 4,750-4,999 pesos |
| 41 | 5,000-5,499 pesos |
| 42 | 5,500-5,999 pesos |
| 43 | 6,000-6,499 pesos |
| 44 | 6,500-6,999 pesos |
| 45 | 7,000-7,499 pesos |
| 46 | 7,500-7,999 pesos |
| 47 | 8,000-8,499 pesos |
| 48 | 8,500-8,999 pesos |
| 49 | 9,000-9,499 pesos |
| 50 | 9,500-9,999 pesos |
| 51 | 10,000-12,499 pesos |
| 52 | 12,500-14,999 pesos |
| 53 | 15,000-17,499 pesos |
| 54 | 17,500-19,999 pesos |
| 55 | 20,000-22,499 pesos |
| 56 | 22,500-24,999 pesos |
| 57 | 25,000-29,999 pesos |
| 58 | 30,000-34,999 pesos |
| 59 | 35,000-39,999 pesos |
| 60 | 40,000-44,999 pesos |
| 61 | 45,000-49,999 pesos |
| 62 | 50,000-59,999 pesos |
| 63 | 60,000-69,999 pesos |
| 64 | 70,000-79,999 pesos |
| 65 | 80,000-89,999 pesos |
| 66 | 90,000-99,999 pesos |
| 67 | 100,000-199,999 pesos |
| 68 | 200,000-299,999 pesos |
| 69 | 300,000-399,999 pesos |
| 70 | 400,000-499,999 pesos |
| 71 | 500,000-599,999 pesos |
| 72 | 600,000-699,999 pesos |
| 73 | 700,000-799,999 pesos |
| 74 | 800,000-899,999 pesos |
| 75 | 900,000-999,999 pesos |
| 76 | 1,000,000-1,999,999 pesos |
| 77 | 2,000,000-2,999,999 pesos |
| 78 | 3,000,000-3,999,999 pesos |
| 79 | 4,000,000-5,000,000 pesos |
| 99 | Unknown/missing |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
This variable indicates the subfamily's total annual income in pesos for 1969 from all persons in the subfamily. For the meaning of subfamilies in this census, see SUBFNUM. The census question was phrased in terms of cash income to include earnings, salaries, commissions, tips, interest, dividends, yields, scholarships, income derived from self-employment (with costs subtracted), and so forth, deducting amounts spent on taxes, Social Security quotas, pensions, etc.
According to instructions given to enumerators, the census question about income was to be asked of all persons age 12 or older, who could answer on an annual basis or in terms of a normal week or month. However, in the sample for Mexico 1970, these individuals' responses were converted to an annual basis, aggregated into a subfamily total, and then attached only to the records for the subfamily heads. In creating INCSFAM, the values for the heads have been applied to all persons in the subfamily.
In addition, income was not provided for single-person subfamilies, either because the census question was not asked of such persons (even if they did meet the stated age qualification) or because their responses were excluded from the underlying data file.
According to instructions given to enumerators, the census question about income was to be asked of all persons age 12 or older, who could answer on an annual basis or in terms of a normal week or month. However, in the sample for Mexico 1970, these individuals' responses were converted to an annual basis, aggregated into a subfamily total, and then attached only to the records for the subfamily heads. In creating INCSFAM, the values for the heads have been applied to all persons in the subfamily.
In addition, income was not provided for single-person subfamilies, either because the census question was not asked of such persons (even if they did meet the stated age qualification) or because their responses were excluded from the underlying data file.
concept
Concept
| Name | Vocabulary |
|---|---|
| Income Variables -- PERSON | IPUMS |