Enterprise Survey 2009
Congo, Rep., 2008 - 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
COG_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank
Created on
Sep 29, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
13961
Downloads
788
- Data files
- Congo, Rep
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Congo, Rep
Overview
Valid:
151
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
643
End:
722
Width:
80
Format:
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS (Problems occurred/extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| Both respondants deliberately refused to give some numbered datas | |
| Both respondants have certainly recognized the importance of the project but wer | |
| Both respondants were cooperative and promised to be available once the World Ba | |
| Both respondants were interested by the project | |
| Datas in numbers were given accurately. | |
| Datas in numbers were given with precision by consulting documents | |
| Despite access difficulties to the company, we should mention that the interview | |
| Despite lack of some numbered datas,we shuld mention that the respondant was ver | |
| Despite many appointments,the interview was well done and this due to the respon | |
| During the interview, I met a very welcoming respondentand interested with the p | |
| Financial related questions were hardly answered because the accountant was not | |
| For this interview we should mention that the respondant was really reticent and | |
| Given datas(in numbers) were drawn from those working documents | |
| Information given with precision | |
| Initiative highly encouraged | |
| Nothing special to be mentionned about this interview if not the difficulties me | |
| Nothing to be mentionned | |
| Nothing to mention | |
| Nothing to say about the realization of this interview,everything went on well | |
| Numbered datas weren't verified(checked) | |
| Ok. The respondent was welcoming | |
| Refusal of datas (numbers) | |
| Responses were given with hesitation | |
| The Manager of the Bakery gave impression of not being interested by the project | |
| The Manager of this company pledged the World bank's efforts through the realiza | |
| The Managing Director seemed to be in hurry and responded quickly to the questio | |
| The Managing Director was cooperative | |
| The Managing Director was very reticent and did not want to give responses to so | |
| The Managing Director welcomed us very well but hasitant about numbers(datas) c | |
| The accountant didn't pay attention to the interviwer but he found the project i | |
| The accountant had difficulties in communicating some numbered datas although sh | |
| The accountant was cooperative surely but was hesitant on some issues especially | |
| The accountant was very cooperative and gave responses without hesitating, with | |
| The director gave me impression that he was in hurry because he hardly responded | |
| The interview took place in good conditions and without difficulties because the | |
| The interview took place in good conditions and without problems because the res | |
| The interview took place with some problems; the respondant was very hesitant on | |
| The interview was carried on well;despite the fact that I didn't get precise res | |
| The interview was conveniently done.The respondant perfectly collaborated during | |
| The interview was done due to the good welcome of the respondent | |
| The interview was done with small problems related to the fact that the responda | |
| The interview was done with the welcoming of the Managing Director who really ap | |
| The interview was done without difficulties | |
| The interview was done without difficulties(problems) | |
| The interview was done without difficulties, I met an respondant who is understa | |
| The interview was done without problem and the respondant was cooperative | |
| The interview was done without problem, the respondant was really interested wit | |
| The interview was done without problems, the interviwee was really cooperative | |
| The interview was done without problems,respondant was cooperative | |
| The interview was done without problems;the respondant was cooperative,despite h | |
| The interview was normally done with datas from accountant documents | |
| The interview was normally done; responses are true(real) | |
| The interview was successfully done | |
| The interview was very welcoming and accepted to be soon contacted by the World | |
| The interview was very well done, a big interest to the project real | |
| The interview was well done | |
| The interview was well done and the respondant wishess that the World Bank conta | |
| The interview was well done as the respondant was interested to the project | |
| The interview was well done depite refusal to respond to those questions | |
| The interview was well done despite lack of responses to some numbered datas | |
| The interview was well done despite the lack of some datas | |
| The interview was well done due to the respondant's wish to have some changes wi | |
| The interview was well done resulting to the collaboration(cooperation)of the re | |
| The interview was well done, respondant was interested by the project | |
| The interview was well done,the respondant really appreciated the fact that thei | |
| The interview was well done;meanwhile we should just mention that most responses | |
| The interviewed person was cooperative | |
| The ireally appreciated the projectnterview was well done, the Managing Director | |
| The manager had difficulties to answer to some questions despite his will of bei | |
| The manager of the company was cooperative and interested by the project | |
| The manager was coperative and appreciated the World Bank's initiative to do thi | |
| The maniging Director was not ready to participate to the interview given how he | |
| The respondant appreciated very much the realization of the project | |
| The respondant certainly accepted to participate in the interview but wasn't ver | |
| The respondant found the questionnaire too long and the interview was too long b | |
| The respondant found the questionnaire too long but he further found the project | |
| The respondant hardly accepted to respond to the questions related to numbered d | |
| The respondant hardly accepted to talk about financial issues, he was really hes | |
| The respondant hardly responded to the questions | |
| The respondant highly encouraged the World bank initiative | |
| The respondant refused to give some responses;this somehow complicated me in ful | |
| The respondant respondent with hurry which shows that he was busy with other thi | |
| The respondant seemed not give fair(true) responses | |
| The respondant seemed not to be interested by the project seing how he gave some | |
| The respondant seemed to be in a mood of doing otherthing instead of participat | |
| The respondant was both interested by the project but less cooperative in commun | |
| The respondant was cooperative | |
| The respondant was cooperative and interested by the project | |
| The respondant was cooperative and interested with the project | |
| The respondant was cooperative and paid a big importance (tribute) to the projec | |
| The respondant was cooperative and welcoming | |
| The respondant was cooperative particularly interested by the project | |
| The respondant was interested by the project but he has also been hesitant while | |
| The respondant was interested by the project which he encouraged the initiative | |
| The respondant was less interested to the survey | |
| The respondant was not interested by the project | |
| The respondant was not much enthousiast or interested by the project | |
| The respondant was not much interested ith the project | |
| The respondant was really cooperative | |
| The respondant was really cooperative and the interview took place without diffi | |
| The respondant was really cooperative and this facilitated the realization of th | |
| The respondant was really cooperative but also hesitated while communicating dat | |
| The respondant was really interested by the project and wish to be contacted by | |
| The respondant was reticent | |
| The respondant was very brief in his responses | |
| The respondant was very cooperative | |
| The respondant was very distrustful and reserved | |
| The respondant was very hesitant in his answers | |
| The respondant was very interested to the project and didn't hesitate to give re | |
| The respondant was welcoming and manifested the wish to be contacted by the Worl | |
| The respondant wascooperative and did not hesitate to answer in a precise way to | |
| The respondant wasinterested by the subject (topic) and responded without diffic | |
| The respondant wasn't cooperative this surely(withoutdoubt) justify lack of inte | |
| The respondant wasn't cooperative;he politely refused to respond to some questio | |
| The respondantd person certainly accepted to respondent to the question but was | |
| The respondent responded with little precision | |
| The respondent responded(answered) with enthousiasm | |
| The respondent was cooperative | |
| The respondent was reticent to give certain informations | |
| The success of this interview comes from the welcoming of the respondant | |
| There wasproblems especially concerning numbers(datas),some were given with diff | |
| This interview was done due to a well welcoming of the respondant and the intere | |
| respondantd person was very cooperative | |
| the accountant paid a considerable tribute to the project | |
| the interview took place with difficulties(insistance)because the respondant was | |
| the interview was carried on without problems because of the respondant's cooper | |
| the interview was done without any problem | |
| the respondant seemed to be hesitant on his responses | |
| the respondant voluntarily accepted to participate to the interview despite som | |
| the respondant was very hesitant in communicating somes responses, especially fi | |
| the survey was well done |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.