| Value |
Category |
| 4 persons participated in the interview. |
|
| CEO had no time, but he accepted to have the interview completed with marketing |
|
| CFO kept saying that questions are stupid and that the whole research is stupid. |
|
| Company owner didn't want to answer some questions. |
|
| Conversation was very pleasant and sincere. |
|
| Conversation went perfectly. |
|
| Do not call us ever again for any interview. |
|
| Excellent cooperation. |
|
| Has no information about finance and won't allow contact with anyone who does be |
|
| He didn't want to provide information about salaries. He consulted his superiors |
|
| He knew answers to all questions by heart. |
|
| I think that respondent didn't want to answer some questions. |
|
| In question j10, respondent was not sure whether homology was import permit. We |
|
| In the section Performance, they refused to give numbers as confidential. |
|
| No objections. |
|
| No problems occurred. |
|
| No problems that might have influenced the results occurred. |
|
| No problems, they were very correct. |
|
| No problems, very decent |
|
| No problems, very kind and decent. |
|
| No problems. |
|
| No unpredictable situations. |
|
| Problems are related to performance. Director put a ban on providing that inform |
|
| Respondent didn't want to provide some information, he was afraid of something. |
|
| Respondent didn't want to reveal figures in questions n3 and d2, since he thinks |
|
| Respondent interrupted the interview for 25 minutes because of urgent obligation |
|
| Respondent is inconsistent. |
|
| Respondent is mistrustful and he gave information reluctantly. |
|
| Respondent is puzzled why questions are so detailed. In the west, such a questio |
|
| Respondent is sincere, he would have been a good interlocutor for providing more |
|
| Respondent is very open for cooperation, she asked the bookkeeping department fo |
|
| Respondent speaks about corruption in detail, but he doesn't want to be contacte |
|
| Respondent thought that the questionnaire had something to do with tax administr |
|
| Respondent was interrupted by president of shareholders' assembly. He criticized |
|
| Respondent was not interested enough in cooperation. |
|
| Respondents didn't like the way some questions were structured. |
|
| She didn't have a financial statement, and she didn't want to provide approximat |
|
| Successfully completed interview. |
|
| The company was sold last year. Out of unknown reason, they froze business opera |
|
| The gentleman noticed that electricity is of primary concern. He asks why there |
|
| The interview lasted very long (he couldn't find financial information) |
|
| The interview was completed with the owner's wife, since she is responsible for |
|
| The interview was completed without any interruption and it was very decent. |
|
| The interview was constantly interrupted because they kept coming in and going o |
|
| The interview was decent, though with many interruptions. |
|
| The interview was interrupted twice for ten minutes each because of professional |
|
| The interview went alright, cooperation with the respondent was alright. |
|
| The lady who agreed to complete the interview runs business for the owner who is |
|
| The respondent is Greek (he speaks Serbian well) |
|
| The respondent is very efficient and quick when answering questions. |
|
| The survey was concluded successfully. |
|
| They don't provide information about finance and everything related to inspectio |
|
| They were decent. |
|
| We waited long for an answer from CFO and CEO. |
|
| Without any problems, conversation went perfectly. |
|
| Without problems and decent. |
|
| Without problems and very decent. |
|
| Without problems that might have influenced the results. |
|
| Without problems, very decent. |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.