Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016
Peru, 2016 - 2017
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 05, 2019
Last modified
Dec 05, 2019
Page views
59991
Downloads
959
¿en quÉ provincia sucedio el robo de autopartes del vehículo automotor (faros, l (P602C_3A_NOM)
Data file: CAP_600_URBANO_1
Overview
Valid:
935
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
609
End:
631
Width:
23
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABANCAY | 23 |
2.5%
|
|
| ALTO AMAZONAS | 4 |
0.4%
|
|
| ANDAHUAYLAS | 8 |
0.9%
|
|
| ANGARAES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ANTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AREQUIPA | 61 |
6.5%
|
|
| AYABACA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAGUA | 7 |
0.7%
|
|
| BARRANCA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BELLAVISTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BOLOGNESI | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| CAJABAMBA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAJAMARCA | 18 |
1.9%
|
|
| CALCA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CALLAO | 26 |
2.8%
|
|
| CAMANA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CANCHIS | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| CASMA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAYLLOMA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| CELENDIN | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| CHACHAPOYAS | 11 |
1.2%
|
|
| CHANCHAMAYO | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHEPEN | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHICLAYO | 22 |
2.4%
|
|
| CHINCHA | 5 |
0.5%
|
|
| CHOTA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHUPACA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHURCAMPA | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| CORONEL PORTILLO | 9 |
1%
|
|
| COTABAMBAS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CUSCO | 53 |
5.7%
|
|
| CUTERVO | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| HUALGAYOC | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUALLAGA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAMANGA | 25 |
2.7%
|
|
| HUANCAVELICA | 14 |
1.5%
|
|
| HUANCAYO | 51 |
5.5%
|
|
| HUANTA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| HUANUCO | 24 |
2.6%
|
|
| HUARAL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUARAZ | 27 |
2.9%
|
|
| HUAROCHIRI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAURA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAYLAS | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| ICA | 11 |
1.2%
|
|
| ILO | 12 |
1.3%
|
|
| ISLAY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| JAEN | 5 |
0.5%
|
|
| JAUJA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| LA CONVENCION | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| LA MAR | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAMBAYEQUE | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| LEONCIO PRADO | 4 |
0.4%
|
|
| LIMA | 79 |
8.4%
|
|
| LUCANAS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MARISCAL CACERES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MARISCAL NIETO | 28 |
3%
|
|
| MARISCAL RAMON CASTILLA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| MAYNAS | 32 |
3.4%
|
|
| MORROPON | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MOYOBAMBA | 29 |
3.1%
|
|
| OXAPAMPA | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| OYON | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PACASMAYO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PADRE ABAD | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| PAITA | 6 |
0.6%
|
|
| PASCO | 4 |
0.4%
|
|
| PISCO | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| PIURA | 16 |
1.7%
|
|
| PUNO | 10 |
1.1%
|
|
| RIOJA | 5 |
0.5%
|
|
| RODRIGUEZ DE MENDOZA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN IGNACIO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN MARCOS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN MARTIN | 51 |
5.5%
|
|
| SAN MIGUEL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN ROMAN | 19 |
2%
|
|
| SANCHEZ CARRION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANTA | 14 |
1.5%
|
|
| SECHURA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| SULLANA | 4 |
0.4%
|
|
| TACNA | 54 |
5.8%
|
|
| TAHUAMANU | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| TALARA | 7 |
0.7%
|
|
| TAMBOPATA | 21 |
2.2%
|
|
| TARATA | 3 |
0.3%
|
|
| TARMA | 2 |
0.2%
|
|
| TAYACAJA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TOCACHE | 4 |
0.4%
|
|
| TRUJILLO | 38 |
4.1%
|
|
| TUMBES | 7 |
0.7%
|
|
| URUBAMBA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| UTCUBAMBA | 5 |
0.5%
|
|
| VIRU | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZARUMILLA | 1 |
0.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
Esta variable no está considerado en el cuestionario de la Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016.