Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016
Peru, 2016 - 2017
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 05, 2019
Last modified
Dec 05, 2019
Page views
58550
Downloads
955
¿en quÉ provincia sucedio el robo de dinero, cartera, celular, etc.?_nombre (P602C_6A_NOM)
Data file: CAP_600_URBANO_1
Overview
Valid:
8560
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1971
End:
1995
Width:
25
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABANCAY | 142 |
1.7%
|
|
| ACOBAMBA | 8 |
0.1%
|
|
| ACOMAYO | 3 |
0%
|
|
| ALTO AMAZONAS | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMBO | 2 |
0%
|
|
| ANDAHUAYLAS | 57 |
0.7%
|
|
| ANGARAES | 14 |
0.2%
|
|
| ANTA | 4 |
0%
|
|
| ANTABAMBA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| AREQUIPA | 390 |
4.6%
|
|
| ASCOPE | 8 |
0.1%
|
|
| ATALAYA | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| AYABACA | 3 |
0%
|
|
| AYMARAES | 3 |
0%
|
|
| AZANGARO | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAGUA | 18 |
0.2%
|
|
| BARRANCA | 42 |
0.5%
|
|
| BELLAVISTA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BONGARA | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAJABAMBA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| CAJAMARCA | 115 |
1.3%
|
|
| CALCA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| CALLAO | 529 |
6.2%
|
|
| CAMANA | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| CANCHIS | 31 |
0.4%
|
|
| CANGALLO | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| CARABAYA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CARAVELI | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| CARLOS FERMIN FITZCARRALD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CASMA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CAYLLOMA | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAÑETE | 47 |
0.5%
|
|
| CELENDIN | 3 |
0%
|
|
| CHACHAPOYAS | 24 |
0.3%
|
|
| CHANCHAMAYO | 29 |
0.3%
|
|
| CHEPEN | 15 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHICLAYO | 345 |
4%
|
|
| CHINCHA | 48 |
0.6%
|
|
| CHINCHEROS | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHOTA | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHUCUITO | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHUPACA | 4 |
0%
|
|
| CHURCAMPA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CONCEPCION | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONDORCANQUI | 2 |
0%
|
|
| CONTRALMIRANTE VILLAR | 4 |
0%
|
|
| CONTUMAZA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| CORONEL PORTILLO | 156 |
1.8%
|
|
| COTABAMBAS | 3 |
0%
|
|
| CUSCO | 358 |
4.2%
|
|
| CUTERVO | 2 |
0%
|
|
| DANIEL ALCIDES CARRION | 3 |
0%
|
|
| DATEM DEL MARAÑON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| EL COLLAO | 12 |
0.1%
|
|
| EL DORADO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ESPINAR | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| FERREÑAFE | 4 |
0%
|
|
| GRAN CHIMU | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUALGAYOC | 3 |
0%
|
|
| HUAMALIES | 3 |
0%
|
|
| HUAMANGA | 428 |
5%
|
|
| HUANCA SANCOS | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUANCANE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUANCAVELICA | 161 |
1.9%
|
|
| HUANCAYO | 402 |
4.7%
|
|
| HUANTA | 11 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUANUCO | 195 |
2.3%
|
|
| HUARAL | 31 |
0.4%
|
|
| HUARAZ | 132 |
1.5%
|
|
| HUARI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUARMEY | 2 |
0%
|
|
| HUAROCHIRI | 3 |
0%
|
|
| HUAURA | 57 |
0.7%
|
|
| HUAYLAS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUAYTARA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ICA | 150 |
1.8%
|
|
| ILO | 47 |
0.5%
|
|
| ISLAY | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| JAEN | 47 |
0.5%
|
|
| JAUJA | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| JORGE BASADRE | 2 |
0%
|
|
| JULCAN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| JUNIN | 3 |
0%
|
|
| LA CONVENCION | 27 |
0.3%
|
|
| LA MAR | 13 |
0.2%
|
|
| LAMAS | 2 |
0%
|
|
| LAMBAYEQUE | 13 |
0.2%
|
|
| LAMPA | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAURICOCHA | 4 |
0%
|
|
| LEONCIO PRADO | 18 |
0.2%
|
|
| LIMA | 1662 |
19.4%
|
|
| LORETO | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| LUCANAS | 8 |
0.1%
|
|
| LUYA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| MANU | 18 |
0.2%
|
|
| MARISCAL CACERES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MARISCAL NIETO | 114 |
1.3%
|
|
| MARISCAL RAMON CASTILLA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MAYNAS | 251 |
2.9%
|
|
| MELGAR | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORROPON | 3 |
0%
|
|
| MOYOBAMBA | 55 |
0.6%
|
|
| NAZCA | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| OTUZCO | 2 |
0%
|
|
| OXAPAMPA | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| PACASMAYO | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| PADRE ABAD | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| PAITA | 17 |
0.2%
|
|
| PALPA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PARINACOCHAS | 3 |
0%
|
|
| PASCO | 165 |
1.9%
|
|
| PATAZ | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PAUCARTAMBO | 3 |
0%
|
|
| PISCO | 27 |
0.3%
|
|
| PIURA | 178 |
2.1%
|
|
| PUERTO INCA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| PUNO | 131 |
1.5%
|
|
| QUISPICANCHI | 2 |
0%
|
|
| RECUAY | 2 |
0%
|
|
| REQUENA | 2 |
0%
|
|
| RIOJA | 20 |
0.2%
|
|
| SAN ANTONIO DE PUTINA | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN MARCOS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SAN MARTIN | 40 |
0.5%
|
|
| SAN ROMAN | 219 |
2.6%
|
|
| SAN ROMÁN | 4 |
0%
|
|
| SANCHEZ CARRION | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANDIA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SANTA | 119 |
1.4%
|
|
| SANTIAGO DE CHUCO | 3 |
0%
|
|
| SATIPO | 14 |
0.2%
|
|
| SECHURA | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| SULLANA | 48 |
0.6%
|
|
| TACNA | 248 |
2.9%
|
|
| TAHUAMANU | 3 |
0%
|
|
| TALARA | 22 |
0.3%
|
|
| TAMBOPATA | 236 |
2.8%
|
|
| TARATA | 4 |
0%
|
|
| TARMA | 20 |
0.2%
|
|
| TAYACAJA | 9 |
0.1%
|
|
| TOCACHE | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| TRUJILLO | 297 |
3.5%
|
|
| TUMBES | 140 |
1.6%
|
|
| UCAYALI | 7 |
0.1%
|
|
| URUBAMBA | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| UTCUBAMBA | 27 |
0.3%
|
|
| VICTOR FAJARDO | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| VIRU | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
| YAULI | 4 |
0%
|
|
| YUNGUYO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ZARUMILLA | 28 |
0.3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
Esta variable no está considerado en el cuestionario de la Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016.