Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016
Peru, 2016 - 2017
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 05, 2019
Last modified
Dec 05, 2019
Page views
72020
Downloads
1039
¿en quÉ provincia sucedio el amenazas e intimidaciones?_nombre (P602C_7_NOM)
Data file: CAP_600_URBANO_1
Overview
Valid:
1604
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
2598
End:
2620
Width:
23
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABANCAY | 45 |
2.8%
|
|
| ACOBAMBA | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| AIJA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ALTO AMAZONAS | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| ANDAHUAYLAS | 14 |
0.9%
|
|
| ANGARAES | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| AREQUIPA | 50 |
3.1%
|
|
| ASCOPE | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ATALAYA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| AZANGARO | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| BAGUA | 9 |
0.6%
|
|
| BARRANCA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| BONGARA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAJABAMBA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAJAMARCA | 20 |
1.2%
|
|
| CALCA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| CALLAO | 75 |
4.7%
|
|
| CAMANA | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| CANCHIS | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| CANGALLO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CARAVELI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CARHUAZ | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CASMA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAYLLOMA | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| CAÑETE | 10 |
0.6%
|
|
| CHACHAPOYAS | 20 |
1.2%
|
|
| CHANCHAMAYO | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHEPEN | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHICLAYO | 25 |
1.6%
|
|
| CHINCHA | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| CHINCHEROS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHOTA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHUCUITO | 8 |
0.5%
|
|
| CHURCAMPA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONTRALMIRANTE VILLAR | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CORONEL PORTILLO | 48 |
3%
|
|
| COTABAMBAS | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| CUSCO | 71 |
4.4%
|
|
| CUTERVO | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DANIEL ALCIDES CARRION | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| EL COLLAO | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| EL DORADO | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ESPINAR | 8 |
0.5%
|
|
| FERREÑAFE | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUALGAYOC | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAMALIES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAMANGA | 61 |
3.8%
|
|
| HUANCA SANCOS | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| HUANCANE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUANCAVELICA | 29 |
1.8%
|
|
| HUANCAYO | 32 |
2%
|
|
| HUANTA | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| HUANUCO | 27 |
1.7%
|
|
| HUARAL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUARAZ | 27 |
1.7%
|
|
| HUARI | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| HUARMEY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAROCHIRI | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAURA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ICA | 16 |
1%
|
|
| ILO | 10 |
0.6%
|
|
| ISLAY | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| JAEN | 14 |
0.9%
|
|
| JAUJA | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| JORGE BASADRE | 8 |
0.5%
|
|
| JULCAN | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| JUNIN | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LA CONVENCION | 9 |
0.6%
|
|
| LA MAR | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| LAMAS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAMBAYEQUE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LEONCIO PRADO | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LIMA | 104 |
6.5%
|
|
| LUCANAS | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| MANU | 14 |
0.9%
|
|
| MARAÑON | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MARISCAL CACERES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| MARISCAL NIETO | 29 |
1.8%
|
|
| MARISCAL RAMON CASTILLA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAYNAS | 75 |
4.7%
|
|
| MELGAR | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORROPON | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| MOYOBAMBA | 21 |
1.3%
|
|
| NAZCA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| OTUZCO | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| OXAPAMPA | 8 |
0.5%
|
|
| PACASMAYO | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| PACHITEA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PADRE ABAD | 9 |
0.6%
|
|
| PAITA | 9 |
0.6%
|
|
| PARINACOCHAS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PASCO | 41 |
2.6%
|
|
| PATAZ | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PAUCARTAMBO | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| PICOTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PISCO | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| PIURA | 41 |
2.6%
|
|
| PUNO | 12 |
0.7%
|
|
| QUISPICANCHI | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| REQUENA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| RIOJA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| RODRIGUEZ DE MENDOZA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN ANTONIO DE PUTINA | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| SAN MARCOS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN MARTIN | 28 |
1.7%
|
|
| SAN MIGUEL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SAN ROMAN | 19 |
1.2%
|
|
| SANCHEZ CARRION | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| SANTA | 35 |
2.2%
|
|
| SANTIAGO DE CHUCO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SATIPO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SECHURA | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SULLANA | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| TACNA | 73 |
4.6%
|
|
| TAHUAMANU | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| TALARA | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| TAMBOPATA | 82 |
5.1%
|
|
| TARATA | 10 |
0.6%
|
|
| TARMA | 7 |
0.4%
|
|
| TAYACAJA | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| TOCACHE | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| TRUJILLO | 57 |
3.6%
|
|
| TUMBES | 29 |
1.8%
|
|
| UCAYALI | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| URUBAMBA | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| UTCUBAMBA | 14 |
0.9%
|
|
| VICTOR FAJARDO | 5 |
0.3%
|
|
| VIRU | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YAULI | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| YUNGAY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YUNGUYO | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZARUMILLA | 12 |
0.7%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
Esta variable no está considerado en el cuestionario de la Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016.