Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016
Peru, 2016 - 2017
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 05, 2019
Last modified
Dec 05, 2019
Page views
98797
Downloads
1223
¿en quÉ provincia sucedio elmaltrato físico y/o psicológico de algún miembro de (P602C_8_NOM)
Data file: CAP_600_URBANO_1
Overview
Valid:
793
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
2941
End:
2963
Width:
23
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABANCAY | 21 |
2.6%
|
|
| ALTO AMAZONAS | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| AMBO | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| ANDAHUAYLAS | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| ANTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AREQUIPA | 26 |
3.3%
|
|
| ASCOPE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ATALAYA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| AYMARAES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AZANGARO | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| BAGUA | 5 |
0.6%
|
|
| BARRANCA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| BELLAVISTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BOLOGNESI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BONGARA | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| CAJAMARCA | 10 |
1.3%
|
|
| CALLAO | 39 |
4.9%
|
|
| CANCHIS | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| CANGALLO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CASTILLA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CAYLLOMA | 5 |
0.6%
|
|
| CAÑETE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHACHAPOYAS | 25 |
3.2%
|
|
| CHICLAYO | 7 |
0.9%
|
|
| CHINCHA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| CHINCHEROS | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| CHOTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHURCAMPA | 5 |
0.6%
|
|
| CONCEPCION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONDORCANQUI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CORONEL PORTILLO | 29 |
3.7%
|
|
| COTABAMBAS | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| CUSCO | 25 |
3.2%
|
|
| DANIEL ALCIDES CARRION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EL COLLAO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAMALIES | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| HUAMANGA | 45 |
5.7%
|
|
| HUANCA SANCOS | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| HUANCAVELICA | 21 |
2.6%
|
|
| HUANCAYO | 16 |
2%
|
|
| HUANTA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUANUCO | 10 |
1.3%
|
|
| HUARAL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUARAZ | 17 |
2.1%
|
|
| HUAROCHIRI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HUAURA | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| HUAYLAS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ICA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| ILO | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| ISLAY | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| JAEN | 11 |
1.4%
|
|
| JAUJA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| JORGE BASADRE | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| LA CONVENCION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LA MAR | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| LAMAS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LIMA | 42 |
5.3%
|
|
| LORETO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LUCANAS | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| LUYA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| MANU | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| MARISCAL CACERES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MARISCAL NIETO | 25 |
3.2%
|
|
| MARISCAL RAMON CASTILLA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| MAYNAS | 41 |
5.2%
|
|
| MORROPON | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| MOYOBAMBA | 13 |
1.6%
|
|
| NAZCA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| OTUZCO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| OXAPAMPA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| OYON | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PACASMAYO | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| PADRE ABAD | 7 |
0.9%
|
|
| PAITA | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| PASCO | 11 |
1.4%
|
|
| PAUCARTAMBO | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| PISCO | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| PIURA | 27 |
3.4%
|
|
| PUERTO INCA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PUNO | 13 |
1.6%
|
|
| QUISPICANCHI | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| REQUENA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| SAN ANTONIO DE PUTINA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| SAN MARTIN | 20 |
2.5%
|
|
| SAN ROMAN | 14 |
1.8%
|
|
| SANCHEZ CARRION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANTA | 6 |
0.8%
|
|
| SATIPO | 4 |
0.5%
|
|
| SECHURA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SULLANA | 5 |
0.6%
|
|
| TACNA | 13 |
1.6%
|
|
| TAHUAMANU | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| TAMBOPATA | 45 |
5.7%
|
|
| TARATA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| TARMA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| TAYACAJA | 5 |
0.6%
|
|
| TOCACHE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TRUJILLO | 25 |
3.2%
|
|
| TUMBES | 13 |
1.6%
|
|
| UCAYALI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| URUBAMBA | 2 |
0.3%
|
|
| UTCUBAMBA | 10 |
1.3%
|
|
| VICTOR FAJARDO | 3 |
0.4%
|
|
| YAULI | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZARUMILLA | 3 |
0.4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
Esta variable no está considerado en el cuestionario de la Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016.