Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016
Peru, 2016 - 2017
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 05, 2019
Last modified
Dec 05, 2019
Page views
59438
Downloads
955
¿en quÉ departamento sucedio el intento de extorsion?_dirección de la vivienda_n (P602B_12A_NOM)
Data file: CAP_600_URBANO_1
Overview
Valid:
2203
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
3968
End:
3980
Width:
13
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMAZONAS | 18 |
0.8%
|
|
| ANCASH | 142 |
6.4%
|
|
| APURIMAC | 19 |
0.9%
|
|
| AREQUIPA | 103 |
4.7%
|
|
| AYACUCHO | 18 |
0.8%
|
|
| CAJAMARCA | 65 |
3%
|
|
| CALLAO | 143 |
6.5%
|
|
| CUSCO | 184 |
8.4%
|
|
| HUANCAVELICA | 52 |
2.4%
|
|
| HUANUCO | 33 |
1.5%
|
|
| ICA | 41 |
1.9%
|
|
| JUNIN | 72 |
3.3%
|
|
| LA LIBERTAD | 95 |
4.3%
|
|
| LAMBAYEQUE | 40 |
1.8%
|
|
| LIMA | 458 |
20.8%
|
|
| LORETO | 100 |
4.5%
|
|
| MADRE DE DIOS | 22 |
1%
|
|
| MOQUEGUA | 65 |
3%
|
|
| PASCO | 43 |
2%
|
|
| PIURA | 83 |
3.8%
|
|
| PUNO | 47 |
2.1%
|
|
| SAN MARTIN | 175 |
7.9%
|
|
| TACNA | 115 |
5.2%
|
|
| TUMBES | 29 |
1.3%
|
|
| UCAYALI | 41 |
1.9%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
Esta variable no está considerado en el cuestionario de la Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016.