Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016
Peru, 2016 - 2017
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 05, 2019
Last modified
Dec 05, 2019
Page views
71563
Downloads
1039
¿en quÉ departamento sucedio el estafa?_dirección de la vivienda_nombre (P602B_13_NOM)
Data file: CAP_600_URBANO_1
Overview
Valid:
4630
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
4248
End:
4260
Width:
13
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMAZONAS | 47 |
1%
|
|
| ANCASH | 368 |
7.9%
|
|
| APURIMAC | 87 |
1.9%
|
|
| AREQUIPA | 78 |
1.7%
|
|
| AYACUCHO | 30 |
0.6%
|
|
| CAJAMARCA | 64 |
1.4%
|
|
| CALLAO | 326 |
7%
|
|
| CUSCO | 271 |
5.9%
|
|
| HUANCAVELICA | 237 |
5.1%
|
|
| HUANUCO | 28 |
0.6%
|
|
| ICA | 184 |
4%
|
|
| JUNIN | 157 |
3.4%
|
|
| LA LIBERTAD | 291 |
6.3%
|
|
| LAMBAYEQUE | 21 |
0.5%
|
|
| LIMA | 965 |
20.8%
|
|
| LORETO | 104 |
2.2%
|
|
| MADRE DE DIOS | 259 |
5.6%
|
|
| MOQUEGUA | 35 |
0.8%
|
|
| PASCO | 149 |
3.2%
|
|
| PIURA | 252 |
5.4%
|
|
| PUNO | 108 |
2.3%
|
|
| SAN MARTIN | 215 |
4.6%
|
|
| TACNA | 199 |
4.3%
|
|
| TUMBES | 17 |
0.4%
|
|
| UCAYALI | 138 |
3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Definition
Esta variable no está considerado en el cuestionario de la Encuesta Nacional de Programas Presupuestales 2016.