IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / UGA_2011_AFB-R5_V01_M / variable [F2]
central

Afrobarometer Survey 2011, Round 5

Uganda, 2011 - 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2011_AFB-R5_v01_M
Producer(s)
The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michigan State University (MSU)
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
7253
Downloads
155
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • uga_r5_data_july_2015.sav

Q66a_UGA Rate performance: good quality service in public health facilities (Q66A_UGA)

Data file: uga_r5_data_july_2015.sav

Overview

Valid: 2400
Invalid: -
Minimum: -1
Maximum: 99
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 630
End: 631
Width: 2
Range: -1 - 99
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
66-UGA. Now let us use a different scale. On a scale between 0 and 10, where 0 means very poor and 10 means very good, how do you rate the performance of your district administration in the following areas, or haven’t you heard enough to say?
A. Ensuring that there is good quality services in public health facilities
Categories
Value Category Cases
-1 Missing data 5
0.2%
0 128
5.3%
1 91
3.8%
2 261
10.9%
3 346
14.4%
4 429
17.9%
5 481
20%
6 297
12.4%
7 136
5.7%
8 103
4.3%
9 31
1.3%
10 33
1.4%
99 Don't know/haven't heard enough 59
2.5%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.