IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / UGA_2011_AFB-R5_V01_M / variable [F2]
central

Afrobarometer Survey 2011, Round 5

Uganda, 2011 - 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2011_AFB-R5_v01_M
Producer(s)
The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michigan State University (MSU)
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
7299
Downloads
155
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • uga_r5_data_july_2015.sav

Q66g_UGA Rate performance: admininstering, managing and regulating the USE of land (Q66G_UGA)

Data file: uga_r5_data_july_2015.sav

Overview

Valid: 2400
Invalid: -
Minimum: 0
Maximum: 99
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 642
End: 643
Width: 2
Range: 0 - 99
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
66-UGA. Now let us use a different scale. On a scale between 0 and 10, where 0 means very poor and 10 means very good, how do you rate the performance of your district administration in the following areas, or haven’t you heard enough to say?
G. Administering, managing, and regulating the use of land
Categories
Value Category Cases
-1 Missing data 0
0%
0 138
5.8%
1 118
4.9%
2 234
9.8%
3 309
12.9%
4 349
14.5%
5 388
16.2%
6 245
10.2%
7 171
7.1%
8 102
4.3%
9 26
1.1%
10 27
1.1%
99 Don't know/haven't heard enough 293
12.2%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.