Rural Capacity Building Project Impact Evaluation 2012, Endline
Ethiopia, 2012
Get MicrodataCreated on
Mar 22, 2021
Last modified
Mar 22, 2021
Page views
9074
- Data files
-
RCBP
_FA_TRAINING_D24_D65.dta - RCBP_CROP_INPUTS_OTHERS_E10_E19.dta
- RCBP_CROP_INPUTS_SEEDS_E20_27_aug17_12.dta
- RCBP_CROP_UTILIZATION_E27_E36.dta
- RCBP_DEMOGRAPHY_B01_B10.dta
- RCBP_EXTENSION_1_DOO_D03.dta
- RCBP_EXTENSION_2_DO4_D16.dta
- RCBP_EXTENSION_3_D17_D23A.dta
- RCBP_FOODCONUMPTION_1_C01_C09.dta
- RCBP_HHASSET_C36_C38_edited250712.dta
- RCBP_HOUSING_C39_C47_F00_E01_E02A_E02B.dta
- RCBP_IDENTIFCATION_A01_A15.dta
- RCBP_LIVESTOC_1_F01_F12.dta
- RCBP_LIVESTOC_2_F13_F22.dta
- RCBP_LIVESTOC_3_F23_F30.dta
- RCBP_PLOT_INFORMATION_E02_E09Edited250725.dta
- RCBP_EXPENDTURE_C10_C35.dta
d61. why haven't you used a technology you saw at a frg/freg activity or field d (d61_f_s)
Data file: RCBP _FA_TRAINING_D24_D65.dta
Overview
Valid:
8
Invalid:
1385
Minimum:
2
Maximum:
5
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
119
End:
119
Width:
1
Range:
2 - 5
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
FRGs (Farmer Research Group) or FREGs (Farmer Research Extension Group)
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wasn�t appropriate technically | 0 |
0%
|
| 2 | didn�t make sense economically | 1 |
12.5%
|
| 3 | wasn�t socially appropriate | 0 |
0%
|
| 4 | unaffordable | 2 |
25%
|
| 5 | unavailable | 5 |
62.5%
|
| 6 | other | 0 |
0%
|
| 7 | i haven�t seen new technologies | 0 |
0%
|
| 8 | the climate is not conducive | 0 |
0%
|
| Sysmiss | 1385 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.