Afrobarometer Survey 2019, Round 8
Botswana, 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
BWA_2019_AFB-R8_v01_M
Producer(s)
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
Created on
Oct 14, 2021
Last modified
Oct 14, 2021
Page views
9365
- Data files
- bot_r8_data_27oct20.sav
Q60. Unrestricted access to the Internet vs regulated access (Q60)
Data file: bot_r8_data_27oct20.sav
Overview
Valid:
1200
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
9
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
944
End:
945
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 9
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Choose Statement 1 or Statement 2.
Statement 1: Unrestricted access to the Internet and social media helps people to be more informed and active citizens, and should be protected.
Statement 2: Information shared on the Internet and social media is dividing Batswana, so access should be regulated by government.
Statement 1: Unrestricted access to the Internet and social media helps people to be more informed and active citizens, and should be protected.
Statement 2: Information shared on the Internet and social media is dividing Batswana, so access should be regulated by government.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Missing | 0 |
0%
|
| 1 | Agree Very Strongly with Statement 1 | 401 |
33.4%
|
| 2 | Agree with Statement 1 | 211 |
17.6%
|
| 3 | Agree with Statement 2 | 176 |
14.7%
|
| 4 | Agree Very Strongly with Statement 2 | 285 |
23.8%
|
| 5 | Agree with Neither | 17 |
1.4%
|
| 8 | Refused to answer | 8 |
0.7%
|
| 9 | Don't know | 102 |
8.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.