Afrobarometer Survey 2019, Round 7
Mozambique, 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MOZ_2019_AFB-R7_v01_M
Producer(s)
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
Created on
Oct 14, 2021
Last modified
Oct 14, 2021
Page views
12655
Downloads
80
- Data files
- moz_r7_data_english.sav
Q83b_MOZ. Province that benefits the most in receiving public resources (Q83B_MOZ)
Data file: moz_r7_data_english.sav
Overview
Valid:
2392
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
0
Maximum:
99
Mean:
26.5760869565217
Standard deviation:
41.7833238642735
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
1070
End:
1071
Width:
2
Range:
0 - 99
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Missing | 0 |
0%
|
| 0 | No Province is favoured | 225 |
9.4%
|
| 1 | Maputo City | 660 |
27.6%
|
| 2 | Maputo Province | 507 |
21.2%
|
| 3 | Gaza | 44 |
1.8%
|
| 4 | Inhambane | 38 |
1.6%
|
| 5 | Manica | 11 |
0.5%
|
| 6 | Tete | 50 |
2.1%
|
| 7 | Sofala | 57 |
2.4%
|
| 8 | Zambézia | 59 |
2.5%
|
| 9 | Nampula | 106 |
4.4%
|
| 10 | Cabo Delgado | 26 |
1.1%
|
| 11 | Niassa | 12 |
0.5%
|
| 98 | Refused | 63 |
2.6%
|
| 99 | Don’t Know | 534 |
22.3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.