The Informal Sector and Formal Competitiveness in Senegal

Type Working Paper
Title The Informal Sector and Formal Competitiveness in Senegal
Author(s)
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2009
URL https://liveatlund.lu.se/intranets/LUSEM/NEK/mfs/MFS/194.pdf
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the informal sector of the Senegalese
economy with focus on the relationship with formal sector competitiveness. The paper
is based on three research questions.
1. What are the characteristics of the informal sector in Senegal?
2. What are the linkages, similarities and differences between the formal and informal sector?
3. How can formal sector competitiveness be improved by actions in the informal sector?
The answer to the first question makes it clear that informal sector businesses are small
in size, number of employees, financial capital and thus output. It is also clear that the
informal sector is rather heterogeneous. This knowledge enables the investigation of the
second research question. These answers are related to the different components used
when assessing competitiveness in an economy: (i) governmental performance and
institutional quality, (ii) GDP and trade performance, (iii) the exchange rate, (iv) the
labour force and production costs and (v) infrastructure. Finally, the third research
question is addressed. There appear to be both synergetic and counteracting effects
between the two sectors with respect to overall economic competitiveness. However,
the counteracting effects seem to be dominating and, in the end, the informal sector
needs to be diminished in order for formal sector competitiveness to be improved.
Furthermore, the results obtained throughout the paper give clear indications why the
informal sector is of such magnitude. It also becomes clear in what areas the main
problems are to be found. Thus, the policy actions suggested in order for the informal
sector to be diminished and formal competitiveness to be improved are (i) eased entry to
the formal sector by re- and deregulations, (ii) a more encouraging taxation system in
order to improve the quality and quantity of public goods, (iii) easier access to financial
capital among small-scale producers, (iv) a labour market that makes education
profitable and (v) proper wages rates.

Related studies

»