Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India

Type Journal Article - International journal for quality in health care
Title Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India
Author(s)
Volume 20
Issue 1
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2008
Page numbers 62
URL http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/1/62.full
Abstract
Objective To investigate the socio-economic differentials in the quality (clinical and interpersonal) of antenatal care and also the correlation between differentials in the quality and utilization of antenatal care.

Design The study uses cross-sectional, nationally representative data from National Family Health Survey (1998–99).

Setting Four south Indian states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) and four north Indian states (Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh).

Main outcomes measured More than four antenatal care visits for utilization, and index of clinical, information and interpersonal quality of care.

Results Lower than desired quality of antenatal care was observed in both north and south Indian states, though the quality was significantly better in south India compared with north India, especially among the disadvantaged women. Significant socio-economic differentials in the quality of care were evident in both north and south India, but were more glaring in north India. A significantly positive relationship was observed between the quality and utilization of antenatal care in the rural areas from village-level multivariate analysis.

Discussion Poor quality of antenatal care is likely to reduce its utilization. Policy and program interventions to improve the quality of care of antenatal care, especially for the poor and other disadvantaged population groups, more so in north India, are essential to improve maternal health outcomes. The India's National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), launched in 2005, should lay greater emphasis on improving the quality of antenatal care, among other things, to increase utilization of antenatal care and achieve better maternal health outcomes.

Related studies

»