Institutional framing and entrepreneurship capital in Uganda

Type Journal Article - World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development
Title Institutional framing and entrepreneurship capital in Uganda
Author(s)
Volume 10
Issue 3
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2014
Page numbers 177-197
URL https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph_Ntayi/publication/269490057_Institutional_framing_and_en​trepreneurship_capital_in_Uganda/links/54c8c7330cf238bb7d0e519f.pdf
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide policy and managerial implications required in solving the daunting problem of the existing low-entrepreneurial capital in Uganda.

Design/methodology/approach
– A large-scale comprehensive survey using a sample of 11,105 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) from 40 high-growth towns was selected and undertaken from five regions of Uganda. The response rate was 40.5 per cent, translating into 4,498 usable questionnaires.

Findings
– Results reveal that institutional framing, entrepreneurship human capital and entrepreneurial moral values predict entrepreneurship capital in Uganda. These results are presented and discussed in detail in this paper.

Research limitations/implications
– The study applied a cross-sectional approach to study behaviour, yet studying behaviour requires time. Therefore, there is need for scholars to undertake a follow up study to test the hypotheses using longitudinal data.

Practical implications
– The paper provides implications for the review and development of supporting institutional frames for entrepreneurship, promoting generalized forms of human capital and entrepreneurial ethics moral values.

Originality/value
– The motivation for the study is derived from the observation that the legal and regulatory framework in Uganda is biased against SMEs. This is manifested in the high-regulatory burden of registering and running enterprises in Uganda. For example, the cost of registering a business in Uganda is high. Legal proceedings in Uganda are inefficient, complex and costly only favouring firms with resources and connections. This may restrict enterprise development and increase the costs of running businesses, distort human capital and entrepreneurial moral values thereby affecting entrepreneurship capital.

Related studies

»