Gender, Headship, and the Life Cycle

Type Working Paper - IFPRI Discussion Paper
Title Gender, Headship, and the Life Cycle
Author(s)
Issue 01481
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2015
URL http://www.wocan.org/sites/drupal.wocan.org/files/Gender_headship_and_the_life_cycle_Landownership_i​n_four_Asian_countries.pdf
Abstract
Despite increasing evidence that households do not always function as one, policies regarding land and
property rights are often formulated at the household level, assuming the primary adult male is the
landowner. Because land policy reform has typically focused on changing household, rather than
individual, rights to land, many of the data are collected at the household rather than the individual level.
As a result of a combination of these factors, securing women’s land rights has remained a largely
unaddressed issue by policymakers. So as to inform the formulation of policies and interventions to
strengthen women’s land rights, this paper analyzes nationally representative data from Bangladesh,
Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam to understand the processes by which men and women acquire
land; the social, cultural, and legal institutions surrounding gender and landownership; and the role of
individual and household characteristics influencing an individual’s ability to own land. Our findings that
women own less land than do men across different types of household structures and that gender
inequality increases with household landholdings suggests that women’s land rights need to be
strengthened within marriage and protected should the marriage dissolve. Although the impacts of
gender-sensitive land policy reform are not well researched, early findings on policy reforms such as joint
titling in Vietnam show that policies to strengthen women’s land rights have the potential to improve
women’s well-being as well as their children’s without detrimental effects on productivity. Our findings
of gender inequalities in intrahousehold land allocation and of increasing inequality as households
accumulate land suggest an agenda for future research and policy that strengthens the land rights of
women, particularly within marriage.

Related studies

»
»
»