Type | Report |
Title | Evaluation study of the national school nutrition programme and the tiger brands foundation in-school breakfast feeding programme in the Lady frere and Qumbu districts of the Eastern Cape |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2015 |
Abstract | School nutrition programmes are widely regarded as excellent interventions to improve the health and well-being of children living in poor circumstances. They reduce short-term hunger, improve children’s food security, lead to more effective short and long-term learning at school, mitigate children’s vulnerability to stunting, and help manage cognitive delays associated with malnutrition. They may also help to protect children from childhood and adult obesity associated with early stunting and the over-consumption of low-nutrient foods. In the long-term these gains are believed to have economic, health, and human development benefits for the population at large. South Africa’s National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) delivers a cooked lunch consisting of a starch, a protein and a vegetable, to all Quintile 1 – 3 schools nationally. These schools service the most deprived communities in South Africa. The NSNP reaches approximately 8,8 million poor children daily. The recently introduced Tiger Brands Foundation (TBF) nutrition programme delivers breakfast in the form of fortified cooked porridge to approximately 50,000 children nationally, primarily in Quintile 1 and 2 schools. TBF is a private foundation working in partnership with the state in all nine provinces to offer this programme. The NSNP is the second largest state investment into alleviating the effects of childhood poverty, after the Child Support Grant, and it has never been assessed for its impact on anthropometric outcomes, learner performance and learner attendance. The TBF in-school breakfast feeding programme was evaluated at its pilot stage (Hochfeld, Graham, Peters, Patel, Nyathela, Moodley, 2013), but not since it has been substantially expanded. This study represents the first attempt to evaluate the outcomes of such programmes, and to assess their effects relative to one another. The findings point to the positive and protective effects of both programmes. Such gains should be celebrated but also need to be corroborated and tested further. Nevertheless this is a good story that needs to be told. |
» | South Africa - General Household Survey 2002 |