This paper examines whether, in India, discriminatory practices by government-employed
child caregivers along religious lines, lead to differential health outcomes among the care
receiving children. Child caregivers participate in a novel allocation game where we
incorporate treatments to disentangle statistical and taste-based discrimination. Our findings
find no evidence of taste-based discrimination or statistical discrimination among the child
caregivers. We also weigh-in on the usefulness of non-incentivized experiments in
discrimination experiments.