Type | Working Paper |
Title | “Shake-shake it off”: implementing SBIRT in Mwembeshi and Central Province, Zambia |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2014 |
URL | https://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/images/publications/cba/2014-zambia.pdf |
Abstract | This cost-benefit analysis was prepared at the request of the Lutheran Health Alliance (LHA) to examine the value of implementing a Screen, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) program in Zambia. The purpose of SBIRT is to prevent and reduce harmful alcohol consumption patterns. The SBIRT program analysis first details the implementation of the pilot program in Mwembeshi, a rural community in Central Province, Zambia. We also consider the costs and benefits associated with scaling the program up to the level of the Central Province. Based on our modeling we recommend the implementation of the pilot program. However, because the results are sensitive to the success rate of the program, we also recommend that LHA monitor the success rate of the pilot program before scaling up to the provincial level. We incorporate various costs and benefits that accrue to LHA, the individual, or society. Cost categories include the following: implementation costs; social network costs; and patient opportunity costs. Benefit categories encompass health benefits; social benefits; productivity benefits; and reduction in health care system benefits. Translating these costs and benefits into a Zambian context required researching Zambian statistics, and when no appropriate statistics were available, making reasonable assumptions for predicting the impacts of SBIRT in Zambia. This framework yielded positive net benefits for both the village and province level programs. In Mwembeshi, the net present value for a successfully treated individual is $2,530 For the Central Province, these figures is $2640. Taking a broader perspective, the estimated net present value of the program overall for Mwembeshi was $202,200 and $35,947,000 for Central Province. Net benefits remained positive using varying discount rates and a lower success rate. |
» | Zambia - Demographic and Health Survey 2007 |
» | Zambia - Labor Force Survey 2008 |
» | Zambia - Labour Force Survey 2005 |