Sub-optimal delivery of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Nigeria: influence of provider factors

Type Journal Article - Malaria Journal
Title Sub-optimal delivery of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Nigeria: influence of provider factors
Author(s)
Volume 11
Issue 317
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2012
Page numbers 1-8
URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1475-2875-11-317.pdf
Abstract
Background: The level of access to intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) in Nigeria is
still low despite relatively high antenatal care coverage in the study area. This paper presents information on
provider factors that affect the delivery of IPTp in Nigeria.
Methods: Data were collected from heads of maternal health units of 28 public and six private health facilities
offering antenatal care (ANC) services in two districts in Enugu State, south-east Nigeria. Provider knowledge of
guidelines for IPTp was assessed with regard to four components: the drug used for IPTp, time of first dose
administration, of second dose administration, and the strategy for sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) administration
(directly observed treatment, DOT). Provider practices regarding IPTp and facility-related factors that may explain
observations such as availability of SP and water were also examined.
Results: Only five (14.7%) of all 34 providers had correct knowledge of all four recommendations for provision of
IPTp. None of them was a private provider. DOT strategy was practiced in only one and six private and public
providers respectively. Overall, 22 providers supplied women with SP in the facility and women were allowed to
take it at home. The most common reason for doing so amongst public providers was that women were required
to come for antenatal care on empty stomachs to enhance the validity of manual fundal height estimation. Two
private providers did not think it was necessary to use the DOT strategy because they assumed that women would
take their drugs at home. Availability of SP and water in the facility, and concerns about side effects were not
considered impediments to delivery of IPTp.
Conclusion: There was low level of knowledge of the guidelines for implementation of IPTp by all providers,
especially those in the private sector. This had negative effects such as non-practice of DOT strategy by most of the
providers, which can lead to low levels of adherence to IPTp and ineffectiveness of IPTp. Capacity development and
regular supportive supervisory visits by programme managers could help improve the provision of IPTp.

Related studies

»