POL_2024_WBCS_v01_M DDI_POL_2024_WBCS_v01_M_WB Development Data Group 2024-12-20 Python 3 World Bank Group Country Survey 2024 WBCS 2024 POL_2024_WBCS_v01_M Public Opinion Research Group World Bank Group Public Opinion Research Group Public Opinion Research Group The World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey Program (COS) is an ongoing effort to systematically gauge and track the perceptions and views of the World Bank Group's clients and partners across the globe over time. The survey data give the institution a more in-depth understanding of stakeholders' views on issues related to the World Bank's work on the ground (how it operates, its relationships, and its knowledge) and other development-related issues. The Department of External and Corporate Relations Business Intelligence Team oversees the program. This collection hosts open, accessible survey data from 29 countries collected in FY 2012 (July 2011-June 2012), 41 countries in FY 2013 (July 2012-June 2013), 42 countries in FY 2014 (July 2013-June 2014), 35 countries in FY 2015 (July 2014-June 2015), 45 countries in FY 2016 (July 2015-June 2016), 35 countries in FY 2017 (July 2016-June 2017), and 39 countries in FY 2018 (July 2017-June 2018), 42 countries in FY 2019 (July 2018-June 2019), 21 countries in FY 2020 (July 2019-June 2020), 36 countries in FY 2021 (July 2020-June 2021), 23 countries in FY 2022 (July 2021-June 2022), 31 countries in FY 2023 (July 2022-June 2023) and over 40 countries in FY2024 (July 2023-June 2024). All data will be regularly updated, and more countries will be added as data becomes available. Edited, anonymized dataset for public distribution. Poland National coverage Sample survey data [ssd] Public Opinion Research Group The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. poland_cos_fy24_data Data collected using the 2024 Poland World Bank Group Country Survey questionnaire (FY24). Dataset covers the following themes: • Objectives • Methodology Overview • Overall Context • Overall Attitudes Toward the World Bank Group • World Bank Group’s Support for Development Areas • World Bank Group’s Work and Engagement on the Ground in Poland • Financial Instruments and Knowledge Work • The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Poland • Communications and Outreach • Sample Demographics and Detailed Methodology 149 154 World Bank 149 0 101 250 What is your primary professional affiliation? What is your primary professional affiliation? 149 0 1 9 1 Office of the Prime Minister, Minister 1 2 Office of a Parliamentarian (National Assembly, Legislative body) 1 3 Government Institution: Employee of a Ministry / Ministerial Department / Project Implementation Unit / Independent Government Institution (e.g., Central Bank (National Bank of Poland), Regulatory or Oversight Agency) / State-Owned Enterprise 42 4 Local Government Office or Staff 37 5 Bilateral or Multilateral Agency (e.g., embassy, development organization, development bank, UN Agency) 6 6 Civil Society Organization: local and regional (NGO 20 7 Private Sector: Private Company / Financial Sector Organization / Private Bank 12 8 Academia / Research Centers 16 9 Media 14 10 Other 0 World Bank Group How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Poland? 149 0 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 4 2 6 3 12 4 10 5 18 6 19 7 28 8 23 9 11 10 Very familiar 18 International Monetary Fund How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Poland? 149 0 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 14 2 11 3 14 4 22 5 19 6 20 7 19 8 13 9 9 10 Very familiar 8 United Nations (incl. specialized agencies, e.g. UNICEF, UNHCR, IOM) How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Poland? 149 0 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 3 2 11 3 22 4 14 5 22 6 18 7 22 8 21 9 10 10 Very familiar 6 European Union How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Poland? 149 0 4 10 1 Not familiar at all 0 2 0 3 0 4 5 5 5 6 11 7 12 8 29 9 36 10 Very familiar 51 European Investment Bank (EIB) How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Poland? 149 0 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 9 2 8 3 17 4 5 5 23 6 15 7 28 8 21 9 10 10 Very familiar 13 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Poland? 149 0 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 12 2 11 3 16 4 10 5 25 6 17 7 18 8 20 9 10 10 Very familiar 10 Do you collaborate/work with the World Bank Group (WBG) in Poland? Do you collaborate/work with the World Bank Group (WBG) in Poland? 149 0 1 2 1 Yes 76 2 No 73 Which of the following WBG agencies do you collaborate/work with in Poland? (World Bank (IBRD)) Which of the following WBG agencies do you collaborate/work with in Poland? (World Bank (IBRD)) 76 73 0 1 Which of the following WBG agencies do you collaborate/work with in Poland? (International Finance Corporation (IFC)) Which of the following WBG agencies do you collaborate/work with in Poland? (International Finance Corporation (IFC)) 76 73 0 1 Which of the following WBG agencies do you collaborate/work with in Poland? (Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)) Which of the following WBG agencies do you collaborate/work with in Poland? (Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)) 76 73 0 1 National government How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 149 0 1 11 1 Not at all 1 2 3 3 5 4 8 5 20 6 23 7 25 8 24 9 17 10 Very much 19 11 Don't know 4 Local government How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 149 0 1 11 1 Not at all 1 2 2 3 2 4 5 5 16 6 17 7 23 8 32 9 23 10 Very much 25 11 Don't know 3 Central Bank (National Bank of Poland) How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 148 1 1 11 1 Not at all 9 2 10 3 13 4 17 5 29 6 21 7 15 8 11 9 5 10 Very much 10 11 Don't know 8 Sysmiss 1 World Bank Group How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 148 1 1 11 1 Not at all 2 2 3 3 5 4 7 5 19 6 24 7 24 8 27 9 14 10 Very much 10 11 Don't know 13 Sysmiss 1 International Monetary Fund How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 149 0 1 11 1 Not at all 3 2 3 3 7 4 10 5 17 6 23 7 21 8 19 9 6 10 Very much 10 11 Don't know 30 United Nations (incl. specialized agencies, e.g. UNICEF, UNHCR, IOM) How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 149 0 1 11 1 Not at all 1 2 6 3 2 4 8 5 25 6 16 7 22 8 23 9 13 10 Very much 11 11 Don't know 22 European Commission How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 148 1 1 10 1 Not at all 3 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 22 6 25 7 23 8 31 9 15 10 Very much 18 11 Don't know 0 Sysmiss 1 Regional development banks (e.g., EIB, EBRD) How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 147 2 1 11 1 Not at all 1 2 2 3 9 4 8 5 19 6 23 7 21 8 20 9 18 10 Very much 12 11 Don't know 14 Sysmiss 2 Private sector How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 148 1 2 11 1 Not at all 0 2 5 3 3 4 10 5 32 6 17 7 30 8 25 9 10 10 Very much 9 11 Don't know 7 Sysmiss 1 Civil society (e.g., NGOs, CBOs) How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 148 1 1 11 1 Not at all 2 2 1 3 1 4 4 5 12 6 14 7 34 8 33 9 27 10 Very much 16 11 Don't know 4 Sysmiss 1 Academia / research centers How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 147 2 3 11 1 Not at all 0 2 0 3 4 4 4 5 17 6 16 7 30 8 40 9 15 10 Very much 16 11 Don't know 5 Sysmiss 2 Media How much do you trust each of the following institutions to do what is right for Poland? 147 2 1 11 1 Not at all 3 2 6 3 10 4 11 5 33 6 26 7 28 8 17 9 4 10 Very much 4 11 Don't know 5 Sysmiss 2 How effective is the World Bank Group (WBG) in helping Poland achieve development results? How effective is the World Bank Group (WBG) in helping Poland achieve development results? 149 0 2 11 1 Not effective at all 0 2 1 3 4 4 4 5 20 6 21 7 25 8 23 9 13 10 Very effective 8 11 Don't know 30 How significant a contribution do you believe the WBG’s knowledge work makes to development results in Poland? How significant a contribution do you believe the WBG’s knowledge work makes to development results in Poland? 149 0 2 11 1 Not significant at all 0 2 1 3 5 4 9 5 15 6 18 7 25 8 21 9 15 10 Very significant 22 11 Don't know 18 The WBG currently plays a relevant role in development in Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 149 0 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 4 2 4 3 12 4 11 5 23 6 21 7 20 8 14 9 9 10 Strongly agree 9 11 Don't know 22 The WBG’s work is aligned with what I consider the development priorities for Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 149 0 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 3 2 2 3 8 4 5 5 15 6 22 7 26 8 15 9 12 10 Strongly agree 13 11 Don't know 28 The WBG has a positive influence on shaping development policy in Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 149 0 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 2 3 8 4 8 5 19 6 17 7 24 8 22 9 12 10 Strongly agree 12 11 Don't know 23 The WBG’s work helps end poverty in Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 149 0 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 7 2 7 3 8 4 9 5 24 6 21 7 15 8 8 9 8 10 Strongly agree 7 11 Don't know 35 Convening / bringing together different groups of stakeholders Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Capacity development and training Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Technical assistance and implementation support (incl. project design and implementation) Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Financial resources (e.g., investment lending, trust funds) Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Mobilizing third party financial resources (incl. both public and private) Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Knowledge and analytical products (e.g., data, reports, policy notes) Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Other Which WBG instruments do you VALUE the most in Poland? (Select up to 2) 149 0 0 1 Gender equity Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Water / sanitation Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Health / pandemic preparedness Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Transport infrastructure Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Energy Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Public sector governance Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Agriculture / food security Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Education Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Climate change Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Digital infrastructure development Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Private sector development Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Environment / natural resource management Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Urban development Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Social protection Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Jobs / Skills development Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Debt management Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Judicial reform Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Demographic crisis Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Other Which areas should the WBG prioritize to have the most impact on development results in Poland? (Select up to 5) 146 3 0 1 Health: primary health systems, coordinated/integrated care, pandemic preparedness, eradicating infectious diseases, long-term care How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of human development in Poland? 146 3 1 11 1 Not effective at all 3 2 3 3 7 4 4 5 9 6 9 7 10 8 2 9 3 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 94 Sysmiss 3 Social protection: social assistance, social safety nets, reskilling & upskilling programs How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of human development in Poland? 146 3 1 11 1 Not effective at all 3 2 3 3 7 4 4 5 14 6 10 7 12 8 7 9 2 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 82 Sysmiss 3 Social inclusion: Entrepreneurship & labor market inclusion for refugees, increasing opportunities for marginalized people to participate fully in markets, services, technologies, and society How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of human development in Poland? 146 3 1 11 1 Not effective at all 2 2 2 3 8 4 4 5 13 6 4 7 11 8 13 9 3 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 84 Sysmiss 3 Transport: bridges, sustainable transportation, public transport How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of infrastructure in Poland? 145 4 1 11 1 Not effective at all 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 5 9 6 12 7 18 8 7 9 3 10 Very effective 0 11 Don't know 81 Sysmiss 4 Water supply and sanitation infrastructure How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of infrastructure in Poland? 143 6 1 11 1 Not effective at all 1 2 2 3 4 4 8 5 8 6 12 7 12 8 5 9 3 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 86 Sysmiss 6 Digital development: digital services, digital skills development, digital urban solutions, digitization of companies How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of infrastructure in Poland? 141 8 1 11 1 Not effective at all 3 2 2 3 4 4 6 5 11 6 10 7 17 8 7 9 7 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 72 Sysmiss 8 Urban development: urban planning, services, and institutions, green-blue infrastructure How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of infrastructure in Poland? 143 6 1 11 1 Not effective at all 2 2 4 3 5 4 3 5 8 6 12 7 24 8 8 9 5 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 69 Sysmiss 6 Energy / extractives: transition to cleaner energy sources, energy efficiency How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of infrastructure in Poland? 144 5 1 11 1 Not effective at all 1 2 1 3 6 4 5 5 13 6 10 7 23 8 11 9 8 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 63 Sysmiss 5 Public sector governance: just transition preparedness, green procurement How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of finance / institutions / economic growth in Poland? 142 7 1 11 1 Not effective at all 4 2 5 3 4 4 4 5 10 6 17 7 19 8 19 9 2 10 Very effective 6 11 Don't know 52 Sysmiss 7 Private sector development: business regulation, access to finance (incl. green finance), improved competitiveness, innovation support, MSME support, supporting entrepreneurship of people with special needs (e.g., refugees), public-private partnership How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of finance / institutions / economic growth in Poland? 142 7 1 11 1 Not effective at all 4 2 3 3 5 4 5 5 6 6 16 7 13 8 11 9 7 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 69 Sysmiss 7 Job creation/employment: labor policies, skills development How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of finance / institutions / economic growth in Poland? 142 7 1 11 1 Not effective at all 5 2 4 3 6 4 5 5 9 6 14 7 15 8 8 9 3 10 Very effective 0 11 Don't know 73 Sysmiss 7 Macroeconomic & fiscal stability: sustainable fiscal policy, fiscal board, local public finance, efficiency of tax administration How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of finance / institutions / economic growth in Poland? 142 7 1 11 1 Not effective at all 3 2 3 3 5 4 5 5 7 6 11 7 17 8 11 9 4 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 73 Sysmiss 7 Regional integration: promote common physical and institutional infrastructure How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of finance / institutions / economic growth in Poland? 142 7 1 11 1 Not effective at all 4 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 8 6 7 7 23 8 9 9 5 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 71 Sysmiss 7 Environment / natural resource management: air/water quality, sustainable land and aquatic resource management How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of environmental sustainability in Poland? 139 10 1 11 1 Not effective at all 4 2 6 3 3 4 2 5 8 6 17 7 14 8 20 9 6 10 Very effective 1 11 Don't know 58 Sysmiss 10 Climate change: transition to low-carbon economy, climate change resilience How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of environmental sustainability in Poland? 140 9 1 11 1 Not effective at all 4 2 7 3 2 4 3 5 8 6 19 7 19 8 18 9 7 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 50 Sysmiss 9 Land use: recultivation and repurposing of post-industrial land plots How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of environmental sustainability in Poland? 138 11 1 11 1 Not effective at all 4 2 7 3 4 4 6 5 10 6 9 7 14 8 9 9 0 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 73 Sysmiss 11 Disaster risk management: flood and natural disaster protection How EFFECTIVE has the WBG been at achieving development results in each of these areas of environmental sustainability in Poland? 138 11 1 11 1 Not effective at all 3 2 6 3 3 4 5 5 2 6 9 7 17 8 5 9 4 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 82 Sysmiss 11 Responsiveness to needs in Poland To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in terms of the following? 137 12 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 5 3 3 4 5 5 11 6 20 7 21 8 16 9 9 10 To a very significant degree 6 11 Don't know 38 Sysmiss 12 Access to WBG staff and experts To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in terms of the following? 137 12 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 3 3 7 4 4 5 8 6 13 7 19 8 30 9 11 10 To a very significant degree 12 11 Don't know 27 Sysmiss 12 Openness (sharing data and other information) To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in terms of the following? 137 12 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 2 3 5 4 3 5 12 6 14 7 17 8 26 9 10 10 To a very significant degree 17 11 Don't know 28 Sysmiss 12 Being a knowledge provider for public stakeholders To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in terms of the following? 136 13 1 11 1 To no degree at all 4 2 1 3 2 4 5 5 8 6 13 7 23 8 28 9 12 10 To a very significant degree 12 11 Don't know 28 Sysmiss 13 Being a convening power for stakeholders To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in terms of the following? 137 12 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 3 3 4 4 6 5 4 6 11 7 23 8 22 9 13 10 To a very significant degree 12 11 Don't know 36 Sysmiss 12 Being a long-term partner to Poland To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in terms of the following? 137 12 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 2 3 2 4 4 5 3 6 10 7 23 8 22 9 23 10 To a very significant degree 18 11 Don't know 27 Sysmiss 12 National government To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 132 17 1 11 1 To no degree at all 2 2 0 3 3 4 3 5 10 6 9 7 17 8 24 9 12 10 To a very significant degree 6 11 Don't know 46 Sysmiss 17 Local government To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 132 17 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 3 3 3 4 6 5 13 6 14 7 20 8 14 9 11 10 To a very significant degree 5 11 Don't know 40 Sysmiss 17 Parliament / legislative branch To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 131 18 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 8 6 9 7 10 8 7 9 1 10 To a very significant degree 2 11 Don't know 81 Sysmiss 18 Private sector To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 130 19 1 11 1 To no degree at all 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 8 6 12 7 11 8 11 9 5 10 To a very significant degree 1 11 Don't know 69 Sysmiss 19 Civil society (e.g., NGOs, CBOs) To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 132 17 1 11 1 To no degree at all 3 2 2 3 4 4 7 5 7 6 8 7 19 8 12 9 5 10 To a very significant degree 5 11 Don't know 60 Sysmiss 17 Other donors and development partners (e.g., EBRD, EIB, UN agencies) To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 132 17 1 11 1 To no degree at all 4 2 1 3 4 4 0 5 2 6 5 7 10 8 11 9 8 10 To a very significant degree 4 11 Don't know 83 Sysmiss 17 Academia / research centers / think tanks To what extent is the WBG an effective development partner in Poland, in terms of collaborating with the following groups? 132 17 1 11 1 To no degree at all 2 2 1 3 3 4 5 5 4 6 8 7 17 8 11 9 7 10 To a very significant degree 4 11 Don't know 70 Sysmiss 17 Local government In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Parliament / legislative branch In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Private sector In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Civil society (e.g., NGOs, CBOs) In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Other donors and development partners In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Academia / research centers / think tanks In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Media In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 Other In addition to its partnership with the national government, which of the following should the WBG collaborate with more to have greater impact in Poland? (Select up to 2) 132 17 0 1 The WBG’s financial instruments (i.e., budget support, trust funds) meet the needs of Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 131 18 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 3 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 15 6 6 7 14 8 9 9 5 10 Strongly agree 3 11 Don't know 58 Sysmiss 18 The WBG provides financial support in a timely manner To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 130 19 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 5 11 6 14 7 7 8 10 9 7 10 Strongly agree 3 11 Don't know 66 Sysmiss 19 The WBG effectively monitors and evaluates the projects it supports in Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 130 19 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 1 3 3 4 4 5 2 6 11 7 12 8 14 9 13 10 Strongly agree 9 11 Don't know 59 Sysmiss 19 Have you ever used the WBG’s knowledge work, including participating in workshops or training programs? Have you ever used the WBG’s knowledge work, including participating in workshops or training programs? 131 18 1 2 1 Yes 82 2 No 49 Sysmiss 18 I am satisfied with the quality of the WBG’s knowledge work in Poland To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 129 20 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 2 3 2 4 3 5 6 6 11 7 18 8 21 9 21 10 Strongly agree 19 11 Don't know 24 Sysmiss 20 Working with the WBG increases Poland’s institutional capacity To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 129 20 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 1 2 4 3 3 4 5 5 3 6 10 7 19 8 24 9 18 10 Strongly agree 15 11 Don't know 27 Sysmiss 20 The WBG brings global expertise to Poland as part of its knowledge work To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 127 22 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 3 6 12 7 18 8 23 9 21 10 Strongly agree 17 11 Don't know 22 Sysmiss 22 The WBG’s knowledge work is tailored to Poland’s context To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 129 20 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 3 3 6 4 7 5 10 6 11 7 20 8 21 9 13 10 Strongly agree 10 11 Don't know 26 Sysmiss 20 When I need to consult the WBG’s knowledge work, I know how to find it To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 128 21 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 4 2 5 3 8 4 10 5 7 6 13 7 16 8 21 9 14 10 Strongly agree 10 11 Don't know 20 Sysmiss 21 The WBG’s knowledge work is relevant to the country's needs To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 127 22 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 1 2 4 3 5 4 8 5 11 6 12 7 18 8 16 9 12 10 Strongly agree 8 11 Don't know 32 Sysmiss 22 The WBG’s knowledge work recommendations are systematically implemented in the country To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 128 21 1 11 1 Strongly disagree 4 2 6 3 9 4 7 5 12 6 7 7 17 8 5 9 8 10 Strongly agree 4 11 Don't know 49 Sysmiss 21 e-Newsletters How would you prefer to receive communication from the WBG? (Select up to 2) 129 20 0 1 Direct contact with staff (e.g., in person, virtually, phone, email) How would you prefer to receive communication from the WBG? (Select up to 2) 129 20 0 1 Social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter) How would you prefer to receive communication from the WBG? (Select up to 2) 129 20 0 1 Direct messaging (e.g., WhatsApp, Telegram, Viber) How would you prefer to receive communication from the WBG? (Select up to 2) 129 20 0 1 Event / conference / seminar / workshop (in person or online) How would you prefer to receive communication from the WBG? (Select up to 2) 129 20 0 1 Other How would you prefer to receive communication from the WBG? (Select up to 2) 129 20 0 1 Do you recall seeing or hearing anything about the WBG recently? Do you recall seeing or hearing anything about the WBG recently? 129 20 1 2 1 Yes 57 2 No 72 Sysmiss 20 Television (TV) Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Radio Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Newspapers (print or online) Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Event / conference / seminar (in person or online) Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 WBG websites Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Social media Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Direct contact with WBG staff (e.g., in person, virtually, phone, email) Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Blogs Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Podcasts Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 0 e-Newsletters Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Direct messaging (e.g., WhatsApp, Telegram, Viber) Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Other Where do you recall seeing or hearing this information? (Select ALL that apply) 57 92 0 1 Climate change What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Pandemic preparedness What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Job creation / employment What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Human capital (education, health) What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Food security What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Digital economy What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Women empowerment What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Youth development What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 0 Debt relief for developing countries What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 0 Ending poverty in developing countries What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 WBG economic forecasts What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Changes to the WBG financial and operational model What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 Other What topics were included in what you saw or heard about WBG’s work or research? (Select ALL that apply) 55 94 0 1 More frequent and intense wildfires How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 3 2 A little concerned 19 3 Somewhat concerned 60 4 Very concerned 40 5 NA 2 Sysmiss 25 Decreased crop yields How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 123 26 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 2 2 A little concerned 16 3 Somewhat concerned 47 4 Very concerned 55 5 NA 3 Sysmiss 26 Climate-driven migration How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 125 24 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 5 2 A little concerned 17 3 Somewhat concerned 48 4 Very concerned 53 5 NA 2 Sysmiss 24 More frequent and severe floods How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 3 2 A little concerned 16 3 Somewhat concerned 41 4 Very concerned 62 5 NA 2 Sysmiss 25 More frequent and severe droughts How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 125 24 2 5 1 Not concerned at all 0 2 A little concerned 7 3 Somewhat concerned 30 4 Very concerned 84 5 NA 4 Sysmiss 24 More frequent and severe heatwaves How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 1 2 A little concerned 7 3 Somewhat concerned 22 4 Very concerned 90 5 NA 4 Sysmiss 25 Air pollution How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 3 2 A little concerned 12 3 Somewhat concerned 31 4 Very concerned 72 5 NA 6 Sysmiss 25 Extinction of plant / animal species How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 4 2 A little concerned 13 3 Somewhat concerned 42 4 Very concerned 61 5 NA 4 Sysmiss 25 Land and forest degradation How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 2 2 A little concerned 7 3 Somewhat concerned 45 4 Very concerned 65 5 NA 5 Sysmiss 25 Loss of jobs How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 123 26 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 7 2 A little concerned 35 3 Somewhat concerned 49 4 Very concerned 27 5 NA 5 Sysmiss 26 Increased erosion of shoreline How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 122 27 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 8 2 A little concerned 34 3 Somewhat concerned 50 4 Very concerned 25 5 NA 5 Sysmiss 27 Coastal flooding due to sea level rise How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 123 26 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 7 2 A little concerned 37 3 Somewhat concerned 45 4 Very concerned 28 5 NA 6 Sysmiss 26 Decreased water availability / quality How concerned are you about the following potential impacts of climate change in Poland? 124 25 1 5 1 Not concerned at all 2 2 A little concerned 11 3 Somewhat concerned 34 4 Very concerned 74 5 NA 3 Sysmiss 25 What is the primary specialization of your work? (Select only 1 response) What is the primary specialization of your work? (Select only 1 response) 128 21 1 18 1 Education 5 2 Health / pandemic preparedness 5 3 Social protection 5 4 Gender equity 0 5 Transport 2 6 Water / sanitation 1 7 Digital development 6 8 Energy 6 9 Public sector governance 13 10 Macroeconomics, fiscal / debt management 16 11 Private sector development / trade 0 12 Environment / natural resource management 5 13 Climate change 2 14 Agriculture and food security 1 15 Urban development 13 16 Legal / human rights 0 17 Generalist (specialize in multiple sectors) 27 18 Other 21 Sysmiss 21 What is your gender? What is your gender? 128 21 1 4 1 Female 58 2 Male 66 3 Other 0 4 Prefer not to specify 4 Sysmiss 21 What is your age? What is your age? 128 21 1 6 1 25 or younger 1 2 26-35 11 3 36-45 45 4 46-55 45 5 56 and above 18 6 Prefer not to specify 8 Sysmiss 21 Which best represents your geographic location? Which best represents your geographic location? 128 21 1 4 1 Warsaw & agglomeration 61 2 Regional capital & agglomeration 39 3 Non-capital city/town 21 4 Rural area 7 Sysmiss 21