<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<codeBook version="1.2.2" ID="ZAF_1984_AGR_v01_M" xml-lang="en" xmlns="http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI/Version1-2-2.xsd">
<docDscr>
  <citation>
    <titlStmt>
      <IDNo>DDI_ZAF_1984_AGR_v01_M</IDNo>
    </titlStmt>
    <prodStmt>
      <producer abbr="" affiliation="University of Cape Town" role="DDI Producer">DataFirst</producer>
      <prodDate date="2012-02-06">2012-02-06</prodDate>
      <software version="v5">NADA</software>
    </prodStmt>
    <verStmt>
      <version>Version 01: Adopted from "ddi-zaf-datafirst-agr-1984-v1” DDI that was done by metadata producer mentioned in “Metadata Production” section.</version>
    </verStmt>
  </citation>
</docDscr>
<stdyDscr>
  <citation>
    <titlStmt>
      <titl>Aspects of Group Relations 1984</titl>
      <subTitl/>
      <altTitl>AGR 1984</altTitl>
      <parTitl/>
      <IDNo>ZAF_1984_AGR_v01_M</IDNo>
    </titlStmt>
    <rspStmt>
      <AuthEnty affiliation="Human Sciences Research Council">Nic Rhoodie</AuthEnty>
      <AuthEnty affiliation="Human Sciences Research Council">Chris de Kock</AuthEnty>
    </rspStmt>
    <prodStmt>
      <copyright/>
      <software version="5.0" date="2021-04-03">NADA</software>
      <grantNo/>
    </prodStmt>
    <distStmt>
      <contact affiliation="University of Cape Town" URI="http://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za" email="info@data1st.org">Manager, DataFirst</contact>
      <depDate date=""/>
      <distDate date=""/>
    </distStmt>
    <serStmt>
      <serName>Public Opinion Survey [ind/pos]</serName>
      <serInfo/>
    </serStmt>
    <verStmt>
      <version date="1984">v1: Edited, anonymised data for licensed distribution</version>
      <verResp/>
      <notes/>
    </verStmt>
    <biblCit format=""/>
    <notes/>
  </citation>
  <stdyInfo>
    <studyBudget/>
    <subject>
      <topcClas vocab="CESSDA" vocabURI="http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common">mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion [4.6]</topcClas>
    </subject>
    <abstract>The survey was one of several studies conducted by the Human Sciences Research Council to collect information on intergroup relations in South Africa. The study was a joint investigation by the HSRC's Institute for Sociological, Demographic and Criminological Research and Committee for Research on Intergroup Relations.</abstract>
    <sumDscr>
      <collDate date="1984-02" event="start" cycle=""/>
      <collDate date="1984-02" event="end" cycle=""/>
      <nation abbr="ZAF">South Africa</nation>
      <geogCover>The survey had national coverage</geogCover>
      <geogUnit>The data is only at country level</geogUnit>
      <anlyUnit>Units of analysis in the survey were individuals</anlyUnit>
      <universe>The universe of the study included all South African "white", "coloured" and "Indian" adults in urban areas.</universe>
      <dataKind>Sample survey data [ssd]</dataKind>
    </sumDscr>
    <!-- qualityStatement - ddi2.5 - complex type
     
     This structure consists of two parts, standardsCompliance and otherQualityStatements. 
     In standardsCompliance list all specific standards complied with during the execution of this 
     study. Note the standard name and producer and how the study complied with the standard. 
     Enter any additional quality statements in otherQualityStatements.
     
     -->
    <qualityStatement>
      <standardsCompliance>
        <standard>
          <standardName/>
          <producer/>
        </standard>
        <complianceDescription/>
      </standardsCompliance>
      <otherQualityStatement/>
    </qualityStatement>
    <notes>The survey collected basic demographic data, including: Sex, age, language, education, occupation, marital status, and income. Opinion data collected includes data on: The political and economic situation, the Constitution, race relations, group areas, and media use. The questionnaire administered to "Whites" also included questions on the government's record with regard to handling national affairs, opinions toward opening listed amenities to all races, and attitudes towards immigrants and the country's immigration policy.</notes>
    <!-- exPostEvaluation ddi2.5
      Use this section to describe evaluation procedures not address in data evaluation processes. 
      These may include issues such as timing of the study, sequencing issues, cost/budget issues, 
      relevance, instituional or legal arrangments etc. of the study. 
      
      The completionDate attribute holds the date the evaluation was completed. 
      The type attribute is an optional type to identify the type of evaluation with or without 
      the use of a controlled vocabulary.
    -->
    <exPostEvaluation completionDate="" type="">
      <evaluationProcess/>
      <outcomes/>
    </exPostEvaluation>
  </stdyInfo>
  <method>
    <dataColl>
      <timeMeth/>
      <!-- collectorTraining - DDI2.5
        
        Collector Training

        Describes the training provided to data collectors including internviewer training, process testing, 
        compliance with standards etc. This is repeatable for language and to capture different aspects of the 
        training process. The type attribute allows specification of the type of training being described.
        
        -->
      <collectorTraining type=""/>
      <frequenc/>
      <sampProc>Adapted white, coloured and Indian co-workers' panels of the Opinion Survey Centre of the HSRC were used for the survey. The samples were drawn country-wide but did not include non-urban areas (farms and smallholdings). A procedure of cluster sampling in randomly selected statistical regions, magisterial districts and enumerator subdistricts was used.</sampProc>
      <sampleFrame>
        <sampleFrameName/>
        <custodian/>
        <universe/>
        <frameUnit isPrimary="">
          <unitType numberOfUnits=""/>
        </frameUnit>
        <updateProcedure/>
      </sampleFrame>
      <deviat/>
      <collMode>Face-to-face [f2f]</collMode>
      <resInstru>A structured questionnaire was used to collect data, and was comprised of:  Section A: “Biographical data” on the respondent's sex, age, home language, education level, occupation, marital status, and income);  Section B: Data on the image of the Human Sciences Research Council; Section C: “General” questions on attitudes to South Africa's political situation, and the respondent's attitudes to other race groups.</resInstru>
      <!-- instrumentDevelopment - DDI2.5             
        Describe any development work on the data collection instrument. Type attribute allows for the optional use of a defined development type with or without use of a controlled vocabulary.
        -->
      <instrumentDevelopment type=""/>
      <collSitu/>
      <actMin/>
      <ConOps/>
      <weight/>
      <cleanOps/>
    </dataColl>
    <notes/>
    <anlyInfo>
      <respRate/>
      <EstSmpErr/>
      <dataAppr/>
    </anlyInfo>
    <stdyClas/>
    <dataProcessing type=""/>
    <codingInstructions relatedProcesses="" type="">
      <txt/>
      <command formalLanguage=""/>
    </codingInstructions>
  </method>
  <dataAccs>
    <setAvail>
      <accsPlac URI=""/>
      <origArch/>
      <avlStatus/>
      <collSize/>
      <complete/>
      <fileQnty/>
      <notes/>
    </setAvail>
    <useStmt>
      <restrctn/>
      <contact affiliation="University of Cape Town" URI="http://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za" email="info@data1st.org">DataFirst</contact>
      <citReq>Rhoodie, Nic and Chris de Kock. Aspects of Group Relations (Whites, Indians, Coloureds), February 1984 [dataset]. Version 1.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council [producer], 1984. Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor], 2012.</citReq>
      <deposReq/>
      <conditions>Licensed dataset, accessible under conditions.</conditions>
      <disclaimer>The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.</disclaimer>
    </useStmt>
    <notes/>
  </dataAccs>
  <notes/>
</stdyDscr>
<dataDscr>
</dataDscr></codeBook>
