DDI_BRA_2019_WBCS_v01_M Development Economics Data Group 2019-09-05 Metadata Editor Version 01 (September) BRA_2019_WBCS_v01_M World Bank Group Country Survey 2019 WBCS 2019 Public Opinion Research Group World Bank Group Metadata Editor Svetlana Markova Dania Mendoza Country Opinion Survey The World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey Program systematically measures and tracks the perceptions of the World Bank's clients, partners, and other stakeholders across the globe in client countries. The Public Opinion Research Group surveyed 29 countries in FY2012 (July 2011-June 2012), 41 countries in FY2013 (July 2012-June 2013), 42 countries in FY2014 (July 2013-June 2014), 35 countries in FY2015 (July 2014-June 2015), 45 countries in FY2016 (July 2015-June 2016), 35 countries in FY2017 (July 2016-June 2017), and 39 countries in FY2018 (July 2017-June 2018). In FY2019, surveys were conducted in 42 countries. Nearly all of the World Bank Group's client countries are surveyed in every three year cycle. The Country Opinion Survey in Brazil assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Brazil perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Brazil on 1) their views regarding the general environment in Brazil; 2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Brazil; 3) overall impressions of the WBG’s effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Brazil; and 4) their perceptions of the WBG’s future role in Brazil. Brazil Stakeholder Opinion leaders from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society. Sample survey data [ssd] DataPoder360 Pesquisas, Jornalismo e Comunicação LTDA From April to May 2019, 933 stakeholders of the WBG in Brazil were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG’s work in the country by participating in a Country Opinion Survey. Participants were drawn from the Office of the President, Prime Minister; office of a Minister; office of a Parliamentarian; ministries/ministerial departments/implementation agencies; Project Management Units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of WBG projects; consultants/ contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; local governments; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; the financial sector/private banks; private foundations; NGOs and community-based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; youth groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branch; and other organizations. Other [oth] Via courier and online Qualtrics The results in this year’s Country Survey were compared to those in the Country Survey conducted in FY’16 (response rate was 44%, N=248). Data were weighted to reach the same stakeholder composition in two years, which allows for year comparisons. Stakeholder groups which were not present in both fiscal years were not included in the comparison. Respondents who belonged to the “other” stakeholder category were not included either. As a result, mean ratings, percentages of respondents, and the total number of respondents in both years are slightly different from those of the original data reported in the FY’16 COS report and the non-weighted data presented in appendices A, B, C, D and F. For the weighted stakeholder breakdown and year comparison results, please refer to Appendix E (page 86) of the final report. 32% The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. brazil_cos_fy19_datafile_final_.sav 300 345 .sav id 300 101 400 Survey completion method 300 1 2 1 Paper 20 2 Online 280 When you think about the future in Brazil, are you … ? 300 1 5 1 Very pessimistic 60 2 Somewhat pessimistic 93 3 Somewhat optimistic 98 4 Very optimistic 29 5 Not sure 20 Do you think that economic opportunity for citizens in Brazil is … ? 300 1 3 1 Increasing 68 2 Decreasing 137 3 Staying about the same 95 Urban development 299 1 0 1 0 275 1 24 NA 1 Energy 299 1 0 1 0 291 1 8 NA 1 Water and sanitation 299 1 0 1 0 253 1 46 NA 1 Regulatory framework 299 1 0 1 0 276 1 23 NA 1 Private sector development 299 1 0 1 0 280 1 19 NA 1 Education 299 1 0 1 0 157 1 142 NA 1 Public sector governance/reform 299 1 0 1 0 182 1 117 NA 1 Financial markets 299 1 0 1 0 296 1 3 NA 1 Social protection 299 1 0 1 0 285 1 14 NA 1 Gender equity (closing the gap between women and men, and boys and girls) 299 1 0 1 0 292 1 7 NA 1 Global/regional integration 299 1 0 1 0 293 1 6 NA 1 Welfare of vulnerable population 299 1 0 1 0 284 1 15 NA 1 Job creation/employment 299 1 0 1 0 250 1 49 NA 1 Health 299 1 0 1 0 266 1 33 NA 1 Transport 299 1 0 1 0 284 1 15 NA 1 Law and justice 299 1 0 1 0 283 1 16 NA 1 Economic growth 299 1 0 1 0 215 1 84 NA 1 Disaster risk management 299 1 0 1 0 297 1 2 NA 1 Equality of opportunity 299 1 0 1 0 250 1 49 NA 1 Crime and violence 299 1 0 1 0 267 1 32 NA 1 Natural resource management (renewable/non-renewable) 299 1 0 1 0 279 1 20 NA 1 Climate change 299 1 0 1 0 287 1 12 NA 1 Foreign direct investment 299 1 0 1 0 289 1 10 NA 1 Agriculture and rural development 299 1 0 1 0 281 1 18 NA 1 Trade and exports 299 1 0 1 0 292 1 7 NA 1 Poverty reduction 299 1 0 1 0 254 1 45 NA 1 Anti-corruption 299 1 0 1 0 262 1 37 NA 1 Communicable/non-communicable diseases 299 1 0 1 0 298 1 1 NA 1 Information and communications technology 299 1 0 1 0 294 1 5 NA 1 Environmental sustainability 299 1 0 1 0 272 1 27 NA 1 Transport 293 7 0 1 0 278 1 15 NA 7 Communicable/non-communicable diseases 293 7 0 0 293 NA 7 Information and communications technology 293 7 0 1 0 287 1 6 NA 7 Social protection 293 7 0 1 0 261 1 32 NA 7 Equality of opportunity 293 7 0 1 0 226 1 67 NA 7 Agriculture and rural development 293 7 0 1 0 277 1 16 NA 7 Trade and exports 293 7 0 1 0 289 1 4 NA 7 Crime and violence 293 7 0 1 0 265 1 28 NA 7 Disaster risk management 293 7 0 1 0 291 1 2 NA 7 Climate change 293 7 0 1 0 289 1 4 NA 7 Energy 293 7 0 1 0 284 1 9 NA 7 Anti-corruption 293 7 0 1 0 262 1 31 NA 7 Economic growth 293 7 0 1 0 188 1 105 NA 7 Law and justice 293 7 0 1 0 282 1 11 NA 7 Water and sanitation 293 7 0 1 0 253 1 40 NA 7 Urban development 293 7 0 1 0 265 1 28 NA 7 Financial markets 293 7 0 1 0 291 1 2 NA 7 Public sector governance/reform 293 7 0 1 0 216 1 77 NA 7 Gender equity (closing the gap between women and men, and boys and girls) 293 7 0 1 0 285 1 8 NA 7 Health 293 7 0 1 0 264 1 29 NA 7 Private sector development 293 7 0 1 0 265 1 28 NA 7 Education 293 7 0 1 0 139 1 154 NA 7 Global/regional integration 293 7 0 1 0 283 1 10 NA 7 Job creation/employment 293 7 0 1 0 181 1 112 NA 7 Welfare of vulnerable population 293 7 0 1 0 276 1 17 NA 7 Natural resource management (renewable/non-renewable) 293 7 0 1 0 287 1 6 NA 7 Foreign direct investment 293 7 0 1 0 289 1 4 NA 7 Regulatory framework 293 7 0 1 0 285 1 8 NA 7 Environmental sustainability 293 7 0 1 0 281 1 12 NA 7 Corruption 291 9 0 1 0 212 1 79 NA 9 Private sector involvement and/or influence 291 9 0 1 0 269 1 22 NA 9 Inadequate regulatory framework 291 9 0 1 0 253 1 38 NA 9 Inadequate level of citizen/civil society participation 291 9 0 1 0 230 1 61 NA 9 Inadequate level of donor coordination 291 9 0 1 0 289 1 2 NA 9 Reforms are not well thought out in light of country challenges 291 9 0 1 0 225 1 66 NA 9 Poor coordination within the government 291 9 0 1 0 245 1 46 NA 9 Inadequate level of government accountability 291 9 0 1 0 260 1 31 NA 9 Political pressures and obstacles 291 9 0 1 0 160 1 131 NA 9 Inadequate level of private sector participation 291 9 0 1 0 283 1 8 NA 9 Inadequate level of capacity in the government 291 9 0 1 0 224 1 67 NA 9 Other 291 9 0 1 0 278 1 13 NA 9 The national/federal government 277 23 1 10 1 To no degree at all 39 2 24 3 38 4 29 5 33 6 42 7 29 8 28 9 13 10 To a very significant degree 2 11 Don't know 0 NA 23 Congress 276 24 1 10 1 To no degree at all 36 2 35 3 55 4 45 5 41 6 29 7 19 8 11 9 2 10 To a very significant degree 3 11 Don't know 0 NA 24 Bilateral organizations (e.g., DFID, JICA, GIZ, USAID) 242 58 1 10 1 To no degree at all 9 2 9 3 6 4 23 5 45 6 27 7 49 8 42 9 25 10 To a very significant degree 7 11 Don't know 0 NA 58 The World Bank Group 273 27 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 5 3 9 4 17 5 30 6 22 7 41 8 72 9 53 10 To a very significant degree 20 11 Don't know 0 NA 27 The International Monetary Fund 263 37 1 10 1 To no degree at all 18 2 8 3 15 4 25 5 40 6 37 7 47 8 40 9 28 10 To a very significant degree 5 11 Don't know 0 NA 37 UN 265 35 1 10 1 To no degree at all 9 2 9 3 8 4 20 5 38 6 28 7 55 8 45 9 40 10 To a very significant degree 13 11 Don't know 0 NA 35 Regional development banks 272 28 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 12 3 10 4 29 5 41 6 42 7 54 8 53 9 25 10 To a very significant degree 2 11 Don't know 0 NA 28 Brazil’s Central Bank 270 30 1 10 1 To no degree at all 8 2 9 3 11 4 12 5 36 6 41 7 43 8 56 9 33 10 To a very significant degree 21 11 Don't know 0 NA 30 International private sector 267 33 1 10 1 To no degree at all 15 2 8 3 20 4 24 5 36 6 35 7 55 8 43 9 22 10 To a very significant degree 9 11 Don't know 0 NA 33 Domestic private sector 272 28 1 10 1 To no degree at all 12 2 22 3 11 4 33 5 49 6 42 7 48 8 31 9 12 10 To a very significant degree 12 11 Don't know 0 NA 28 International civil society 266 34 1 10 1 To no degree at all 6 2 4 3 16 4 20 5 40 6 48 7 60 8 46 9 19 10 To a very significant degree 7 11 Don't know 0 NA 34 Domestic civil society 275 25 1 10 1 To no degree at all 8 2 6 3 16 4 24 5 50 6 46 7 62 8 37 9 17 10 To a very significant degree 9 11 Don't know 0 NA 25 Faith-based institutions 265 35 1 10 1 To no degree at all 23 2 26 3 29 4 30 5 51 6 28 7 35 8 25 9 10 10 To a very significant degree 8 11 Don't know 0 NA 35 Domestic traditional media and their web presence 276 24 1 10 1 To no degree at all 11 2 27 3 19 4 27 5 51 6 42 7 43 8 40 9 11 10 To a very significant degree 5 11 Don't know 0 NA 24 International media and their web presence 274 26 1 10 1 To no degree at all 9 2 17 3 14 4 24 5 50 6 41 7 46 8 47 9 22 10 To a very significant degree 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 26 Web based media 272 28 1 10 1 To no degree at all 37 2 25 3 24 4 29 5 57 6 44 7 22 8 19 9 11 10 To a very significant degree 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 28 Human development 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 80 2 Getting somewhat worse 71 3 Staying the same 80 4 Getting somewhat better 47 5 Getting much better 5 NA 17 Equal opportunity for girls and boys, men and women 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 56 2 Getting somewhat worse 61 3 Staying the same 84 4 Getting somewhat better 74 5 Getting much better 8 NA 17 Growing Brazil’s economy in a way that leads to jobs and employment 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 59 2 Getting somewhat worse 74 3 Staying the same 85 4 Getting somewhat better 60 5 Getting much better 5 NA 17 The gap between the rich and the poor 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 91 2 Getting somewhat worse 81 3 Staying the same 80 4 Getting somewhat better 26 5 Getting much better 5 NA 17 Making government more effective 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 65 2 Getting somewhat worse 50 3 Staying the same 84 4 Getting somewhat better 66 5 Getting much better 18 NA 17 Anti-corruption 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 36 2 Getting somewhat worse 20 3 Staying the same 67 4 Getting somewhat better 115 5 Getting much better 45 NA 17 Attracting new sources of foreign investment 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 28 2 Getting somewhat worse 55 3 Staying the same 110 4 Getting somewhat better 81 5 Getting much better 9 NA 17 Natural resources management 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 77 2 Getting somewhat worse 75 3 Staying the same 83 4 Getting somewhat better 40 5 Getting much better 8 NA 17 Climate change 283 17 1 5 1 Getting much worse 86 2 Getting somewhat worse 72 3 Staying the same 90 4 Getting somewhat better 28 5 Getting much better 7 NA 17 Environmental degradation 282 18 0 1 0 253 1 29 NA 18 Fragility in Brazil or neighboring countries 282 18 0 1 0 264 1 18 NA 18 Jobs/employment 282 18 0 1 0 153 1 129 NA 18 Trade constraints 282 18 0 1 0 242 1 40 NA 18 The gap between the rich and the poor 282 18 0 1 0 180 1 102 NA 18 Technology based disruption 282 18 0 1 0 241 1 41 NA 18 Geo political uncertainty 282 18 0 1 0 253 1 29 NA 18 Climate change 282 18 0 1 0 254 1 28 NA 18 Crime and violence 282 18 0 1 0 152 1 130 NA 18 Migrants and refugees 282 18 0 1 0 272 1 10 NA 18 When thinking about development efforts in Brazil, do you think that civil society (e.g., NGOs, CBOs) should … ? 280 20 1 6 1 Engage significantly less 9 2 Engage somewhat less 16 3 Engage somewhat more 49 4 Engage significantly more 167 5 Engage at the same level it does currently 23 6 Don't know 16 NA 20 To what extent do you trust domestic private sector to engage in public service delivery in Brazil? 282 18 1 5 1 To a very low degree 27 2 To a somewhat low degree 109 3 To a somewhat high degree 106 4 To a very high degree 26 5 Don't know 14 NA 18 To what extent do you trust international private sector to engage in public service delivery in Brazil? 282 18 1 5 1 To a very low degree 33 2 To a somewhat low degree 93 3 To a somewhat high degree 109 4 To a very high degree 31 5 Don't know 16 NA 18 World Bank Group (WBG) 279 21 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 4 2 18 3 17 4 17 5 25 6 29 7 48 8 57 9 37 10 Extremely familiar 27 NA 21 Inter-American Development Bank (IDB/BID) 277 23 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 12 2 15 3 21 4 22 5 27 6 38 7 53 8 45 9 23 10 Extremely familiar 21 NA 23 Latin American Development Bank (CAF) 276 24 1 10 1 Not familiar at all 58 2 29 3 27 4 24 5 30 6 37 7 31 8 20 9 11 10 Extremely familiar 9 NA 24 World Bank Group (WBG) 258 42 1 10 1 Not effective at all 3 2 5 3 6 4 11 5 27 6 32 7 51 8 67 9 40 10 Very effective 16 11 Don't know 0 NA 42 Inter-American Development Bank (IDB/BID) 245 55 1 10 1 Not effective at all 4 2 5 3 7 4 9 5 30 6 39 7 53 8 59 9 29 10 Very effective 10 11 Don't know 0 NA 55 Latin American Development Bank (CAF) 171 129 1 10 1 Not effective at all 9 2 8 3 18 4 18 5 28 6 31 7 29 8 17 9 10 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 0 NA 129 To what extent do you believe the World Bank Group’s staff is well prepared (e.g., skills and knowledge) to help Brazil solve its most complicated development challenges? 258 42 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 1 3 5 4 5 5 10 6 13 7 40 8 63 9 65 10 To a very significant degree 52 11 Don't know 0 NA 42 Private sector development 273 27 0 1 0 253 1 20 NA 27 Education 273 27 0 1 0 172 1 101 NA 27 Climate change 273 27 0 1 0 252 1 21 NA 27 Urban development 273 27 0 1 0 237 1 36 NA 27 Law and justice 273 27 0 1 0 269 1 4 NA 27 Financial markets 273 27 0 1 0 266 1 7 NA 27 Social protection 273 27 0 1 0 264 1 9 NA 27 Gender equity (closing the gap between women and men, and boys and girls) 273 27 0 1 0 268 1 5 NA 27 Energy 273 27 0 1 0 257 1 16 NA 27 Water and sanitation 273 27 0 1 0 203 1 70 NA 27 Regulatory framework 273 27 0 1 0 239 1 34 NA 27 Job creation/employment 273 27 0 1 0 239 1 34 NA 27 Health 273 27 0 1 0 248 1 25 NA 27 Public sector governance/reform 273 27 0 1 0 204 1 69 NA 27 Global/regional integration 273 27 0 1 0 261 1 12 NA 27 Crime and violence 273 27 0 1 0 254 1 19 NA 27 Natural resource management (renewable/non-renewable) 273 27 0 1 0 249 1 24 NA 27 Anti-corruption 273 27 0 1 0 255 1 18 NA 27 Foreign direct investment 273 27 0 1 0 262 1 11 NA 27 Environmental sustainability 273 27 0 1 0 238 1 35 NA 27 Transport 273 27 0 1 0 248 1 25 NA 27 Agriculture and rural development 273 27 0 1 0 254 1 19 NA 27 Trade and exports 273 27 0 1 0 264 1 9 NA 27 Economic growth 273 27 0 1 0 219 1 54 NA 27 Disaster risk management 273 27 0 1 0 266 1 7 NA 27 Equality of opportunity 273 27 0 1 0 244 1 29 NA 27 Communicable/non-communicable diseases 273 27 0 0 273 NA 27 Information and communications technology 273 27 0 1 0 262 1 11 NA 27 Welfare of vulnerable population 273 27 0 1 0 254 1 19 NA 27 Poverty reduction 273 27 0 1 0 213 1 60 NA 27 Bringing together different groups of stakeholders 267 33 0 1 0 258 1 9 NA 33 Capacity development related to World Bank Group supported projects 267 33 0 1 0 228 1 39 NA 33 Technical assistance 267 33 0 1 0 246 1 21 NA 33 Policy advice, studies, analyses 267 33 0 1 0 214 1 53 NA 33 Financial resources 267 33 0 1 0 201 1 66 NA 33 Data and statistics 267 33 0 1 0 253 1 14 NA 33 Promoting knowledge sharing 267 33 0 1 0 249 1 18 NA 33 Implementation support 267 33 0 1 0 252 1 15 NA 33 Mobilizing third party financial resources 267 33 0 1 0 247 1 20 NA 33 Donor coordination 267 33 0 1 0 265 1 2 NA 33 Reaching out to general public and advocating for reforms 267 33 0 1 0 260 1 7 NA 33 Other 267 33 0 1 0 264 1 3 NA 33 Bringing together different groups of stakeholders 264 36 0 1 0 254 1 10 NA 36 Capacity development related to World Bank Group supported projects 264 36 0 1 0 214 1 50 NA 36 Technical assistance 264 36 0 1 0 244 1 20 NA 36 Policy advice, studies, analyses 264 36 0 1 0 229 1 35 NA 36 Financial resources 264 36 0 1 0 230 1 34 NA 36 Data and statistics 264 36 0 1 0 252 1 12 NA 36 Promoting knowledge sharing 264 36 0 1 0 240 1 24 NA 36 Implementation support 264 36 0 1 0 222 1 42 NA 36 Mobilizing third party financial resources 264 36 0 1 0 246 1 18 NA 36 Donor coordination 264 36 0 1 0 258 1 6 NA 36 Reaching out to general public and advocating for reforms 264 36 0 1 0 253 1 11 NA 36 Other 264 36 0 1 0 262 1 2 NA 36 Inadequate World Bank Group’s staffing in Brazil 267 33 0 1 0 262 1 5 NA 33 Not client focused 267 33 0 1 0 259 1 8 NA 33 Not collaborating enough with partners such as bilaterals, multilaterals, trust funds, UN 267 33 0 1 0 263 1 4 NA 33 Not aligned with country priorities 267 33 0 1 0 246 1 21 NA 33 Not adequately sensitive to political/social realities in Brazil 267 33 0 1 0 230 1 37 NA 33 Too influenced by developed countries 267 33 0 1 0 237 1 30 NA 33 Not willing to honestly criticize policies and reform efforts in the country 267 33 0 1 0 234 1 33 NA 33 Staff too inaccessible 267 33 0 1 0 262 1 5 NA 33 Not collaborating enough with private sector 267 33 0 1 0 254 1 13 NA 33 World Bank Group’s processes too slow and complex 267 33 0 1 0 184 1 83 NA 33 Not adequately flexible 267 33 0 1 0 234 1 33 NA 33 Not sufficiently focused on sustainable results 267 33 0 1 0 251 1 16 NA 33 Not collaborating enough with civil society 267 33 0 1 0 254 1 13 NA 33 Not enough public disclosure of its work 267 33 0 1 0 209 1 58 NA 33 Arrogant in its approach 267 33 0 1 0 252 1 15 NA 33 Other 267 33 0 1 0 255 1 12 NA 33 Don’t know 267 33 0 1 0 228 1 39 NA 33 To what extent do you believe that the World Bank Group’s work and support help the poorest in Brazil? 261 39 1 5 1 To a fully sufficient degree 14 2 To a somewhat sufficient degree 93 3 To a somewhat insufficient degree 82 4 To a very insufficient degree 41 5 Don’t know 31 NA 39 From your perspective, which of the following best describes the World Bank Group’s current emphasis on investing in human capital (e.g., education, health, social protection)? 259 41 1 4 1 Increased its emphasis recently 42 2 Decreased its emphasis recently 40 3 Emphasis has remained pretty consistent over time 69 4 Don’t know 108 NA 41 Local government 259 41 0 1 0 127 1 132 NA 41 Donor community 259 41 0 1 0 246 1 13 NA 41 NGOs/Community Based Organizations 259 41 0 1 0 200 1 59 NA 41 Academia/think tanks/research institutes 259 41 0 1 0 179 1 80 NA 41 Beneficiaries 259 41 0 1 0 221 1 38 NA 41 Youth/university groups 259 41 0 1 0 240 1 19 NA 41 Private sector 259 41 0 1 0 199 1 60 NA 41 Parliament 259 41 0 1 0 223 1 36 NA 41 Foundations 259 41 0 1 0 227 1 32 NA 41 Media 259 41 0 1 0 249 1 10 NA 41 Other 259 41 0 1 0 249 1 10 NA 41 Don’t know 259 41 0 1 0 254 1 5 NA 41 Overall the World Bank Group currently plays a relevant role in development in Brazil 249 51 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 5 2 10 3 15 4 13 5 30 6 33 7 51 8 42 9 31 10 Strongly agree 19 11 Don't know 0 NA 51 The World Bank Group’s work is aligned with what I consider the development priorities for Brazil 244 56 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 5 2 8 3 9 4 16 5 34 6 30 7 46 8 43 9 35 10 Strongly agree 18 11 Don't know 0 NA 56 Responsiveness to needs 206 94 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 5 3 10 4 15 5 35 6 38 7 30 8 44 9 15 10 To a very significant degree 9 11 Don't know 0 NA 94 Flexibility (in terms of the institution’s products and services) 206 94 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 13 3 10 4 24 5 41 6 37 7 34 8 27 9 10 10 To a very significant degree 5 11 Don't know 0 NA 94 Flexibility (in terms of changing country circumstances) 199 101 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 13 3 9 4 20 5 39 6 33 7 33 8 30 9 11 10 To a very significant degree 6 11 Don't know 0 NA 101 Being inclusive 199 101 1 10 1 To no degree at all 7 2 5 3 9 4 13 5 25 6 20 7 39 8 40 9 21 10 To a very significant degree 20 11 Don't know 0 NA 101 Openness (sharing data and other information) 216 84 1 10 1 To no degree at all 3 2 4 3 7 4 9 5 18 6 28 7 37 8 49 9 35 10 To a very significant degree 26 11 Don't know 0 NA 84 Collaboration with the Government 211 89 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 1 3 3 4 7 5 16 6 19 7 42 8 61 9 36 10 To a very significant degree 22 11 Don't know 0 NA 89 The speed in which it gets things accomplished on the ground 213 87 1 10 1 To no degree at all 8 2 12 3 16 4 30 5 40 6 29 7 36 8 26 9 12 10 To a very significant degree 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 87 Helping to bring discipline/effective supervision to implementation of investment projects 212 88 1 10 1 To no degree at all 3 2 2 3 5 4 13 5 23 6 21 7 50 8 40 9 35 10 To a very significant degree 20 11 Don't know 0 NA 88 Collaboration with civil society 201 99 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 5 3 8 4 18 5 30 6 37 7 24 8 47 9 17 10 To a very significant degree 10 11 Don't know 0 NA 99 Staff accessibility 194 106 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 4 3 5 4 5 5 22 6 22 7 40 8 41 9 29 10 To a very significant degree 21 11 Don't know 0 NA 106 Collaboration with other donors and development partners 172 128 1 10 1 To no degree at all 6 2 1 3 5 4 12 5 19 6 29 7 35 8 32 9 24 10 To a very significant degree 9 11 Don't know 0 NA 128 Collaboration with the private sector 165 135 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 2 3 2 4 14 5 25 6 36 7 25 8 33 9 19 10 To a very significant degree 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 135 Straightforwardness and honesty 214 86 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 1 3 8 4 5 5 18 6 21 7 15 8 47 9 48 10 To a very significant degree 47 11 Don't know 0 NA 86 Treating clients and stakeholders in Brazil with respect 209 91 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 2 3 2 4 4 5 8 6 14 7 26 8 48 9 45 10 To a very significant degree 56 11 Don't know 0 NA 91 Being a long-term partner 216 84 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 1 3 3 4 8 5 12 6 8 7 22 8 46 9 58 10 To a very significant degree 54 11 Don't know 0 NA 84 Technical assistance 248 52 0 1 0 140 1 108 NA 52 Investment lending 248 52 0 1 0 137 1 111 NA 52 Policy based lending/budget support to the Government 248 52 0 1 0 194 1 54 NA 52 Trust Fund management 248 52 0 1 0 234 1 14 NA 52 Knowledge products/services 248 52 0 1 0 195 1 53 NA 52 Capacity development 248 52 0 1 0 185 1 63 NA 52 Multi-sectoral approaches 248 52 0 1 0 195 1 53 NA 52 Other 248 52 0 1 0 244 1 4 NA 52 Don’t know 248 52 0 1 0 245 1 3 NA 52 Social protection If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 91 209 1 9 1 Not effective at all 6 2 2 3 8 4 10 5 16 6 14 7 12 8 20 9 3 10 Very effective 0 11 Don't know 0 NA 209 Gender equity (closing the gap between women and men, and boys and girls) If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 115 185 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 2 3 4 4 7 5 13 6 16 7 23 8 23 9 15 10 Very effective 6 11 Don't know 0 NA 185 Private sector development If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 114 186 1 10 1 Not effective at all 3 3 7 4 11 5 22 6 16 7 22 8 28 9 4 10 Very effective 1 11 Don't know 0 NA 186 Education If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 150 150 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 3 7 4 10 5 16 6 21 7 39 8 30 9 16 10 Very effective 5 11 Don't know 0 NA 150 Public sector governance/reform If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 161 139 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 1 3 3 4 6 5 16 6 17 7 38 8 48 9 24 10 Very effective 3 11 Don't know 0 NA 139 Global/regional integration If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 141 159 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 1 3 2 4 7 5 15 6 20 7 27 8 32 9 26 10 Very effective 5 11 Don't know 0 NA 159 Welfare of vulnerable population If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 122 178 1 10 1 Not effective at all 7 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 22 6 12 7 22 8 22 9 16 10 Very effective 10 11 Don't know 0 NA 178 Urban development If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 152 148 1 10 1 Not effective at all 3 2 2 3 3 4 6 5 15 6 23 7 32 8 31 9 28 10 Very effective 9 11 Don't know 0 NA 148 Energy If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 116 184 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 3 1 4 5 5 16 6 24 7 19 8 21 9 20 10 Very effective 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 184 Water and sanitation If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 156 144 1 10 1 Not effective at all 4 2 3 3 1 4 10 5 12 6 14 7 30 8 30 9 36 10 Very effective 16 11 Don't know 0 NA 144 Regulatory framework If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 130 170 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 3 3 4 8 5 17 6 16 7 20 8 37 9 15 10 Very effective 8 11 Don't know 0 NA 170 Job creation/employment If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 125 175 1 10 1 Not effective at all 8 2 4 3 7 4 11 5 21 6 16 7 16 8 24 9 12 10 Very effective 6 11 Don't know 0 NA 175 Health If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 118 182 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 1 3 6 4 7 5 18 6 12 7 22 8 21 9 17 10 Very effective 8 11 Don't know 0 NA 182 Financial markets If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 92 208 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 3 3 3 4 8 5 15 6 13 7 15 8 18 9 11 10 Very effective 1 11 Don't know 0 NA 208 Transport If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 127 173 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 3 3 5 4 5 5 18 6 12 7 26 8 25 9 17 10 Very effective 10 11 Don't know 0 NA 173 Agriculture and rural development If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 122 178 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 3 3 2 4 6 5 14 6 17 7 21 8 26 9 20 10 Very effective 8 11 Don't know 0 NA 178 Trade and exports If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 94 206 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 1 3 3 4 5 5 16 6 15 7 22 8 16 9 8 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 0 NA 206 Crime and violence If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 82 218 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 3 3 11 4 6 5 14 6 17 7 7 8 11 9 5 10 Very effective 2 11 Don't know 0 NA 218 Natural resource management (renewable/non-renewable) If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 136 164 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 4 3 5 4 8 5 11 6 14 7 12 8 31 9 32 10 Very effective 13 11 Don't know 0 NA 164 Climate change If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 139 161 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 2 3 3 4 8 5 11 6 17 7 21 8 27 9 31 10 Very effective 14 11 Don't know 0 NA 161 Poverty reduction If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 145 155 1 10 1 Not effective at all 7 2 1 3 10 4 8 5 15 6 15 7 18 8 34 9 24 10 Very effective 13 11 Don't know 0 NA 155 Anti-corruption If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 96 204 1 10 1 Not effective at all 9 2 6 3 2 4 11 5 11 6 14 7 13 8 12 9 10 10 Very effective 8 11 Don't know 0 NA 204 Law and justice If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 81 219 1 10 1 Not effective at all 7 2 6 3 5 4 15 5 12 6 9 7 8 8 8 9 7 10 Very effective 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 219 Economic growth If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 145 155 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 3 3 4 4 12 5 16 6 22 7 21 8 31 9 24 10 Very effective 6 11 Don't know 0 NA 155 Disaster risk management If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 94 206 1 10 1 Not effective at all 7 2 4 3 10 4 5 5 11 6 13 7 10 8 16 9 14 10 Very effective 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 206 Equality of opportunity If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 128 172 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 2 3 8 4 11 5 15 6 10 7 19 8 26 9 21 10 Very effective 11 11 Don't know 0 NA 172 Communicable/non-communicable diseases If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 79 221 1 10 1 Not effective at all 6 2 3 3 4 4 9 5 6 6 12 7 11 8 13 9 10 10 Very effective 5 11 Don't know 0 NA 221 Information and communications technology If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 93 207 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 2 3 3 4 6 5 15 6 10 7 14 8 18 9 11 10 Very effective 9 11 Don't know 0 NA 207 Foreign direct investment If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 96 204 1 10 1 Not effective at all 4 2 4 3 2 4 9 5 15 6 7 7 17 8 27 9 7 10 Very effective 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 204 Environmental sustainability If you have NO exposure to/experience in working in any of the sectors listed below, please respond “Don’t know” 141 159 1 10 1 Not effective at all 5 2 1 3 5 4 8 5 10 6 10 7 18 8 36 9 30 10 Very effective 18 11 Don't know 0 NA 159 To what extent does the World Bank Group’s work help to achieve development results in Brazil? 234 66 1 10 1 To no degree at all 3 2 7 3 11 4 10 5 21 6 41 7 54 8 48 9 22 10 To a very significant degree 17 11 Don't know 0 NA 66 To what extent does the World Bank Group influence the development agenda in Brazil? 227 73 1 10 1 To no degree at all 3 2 5 3 11 4 14 5 19 6 48 7 54 8 42 9 17 10 To a very significant degree 14 11 Don't know 0 NA 73 The World Bank Group’s financial instruments meet the needs of Brazil 218 82 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 8 2 9 3 17 4 26 5 28 6 26 7 40 8 38 9 20 10 Strongly agree 6 11 Don't know 0 NA 82 The World Bank Group meets Brazil’s needs for knowledge services 221 79 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 4 2 2 3 10 4 10 5 17 6 27 7 51 8 56 9 32 10 Strongly agree 12 11 Don't know 0 NA 79 How frequently do you consult World Bank Group’s knowledge work and activities in the work you do? 238 62 1 5 1 Weekly 17 2 Monthly 42 3 A few times a year 120 4 Rarely 49 5 Never 10 NA 62 Are timely 177 123 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 1 3 10 4 8 5 14 6 16 7 42 8 54 9 16 10 To a very significant degree 11 11 Don't know 0 NA 123 Include appropriate level of stakeholder involvement during preparation 173 127 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 2 3 5 4 8 5 16 6 25 7 34 8 39 9 26 10 To a very significant degree 14 11 Don't know 0 NA 127 Lead to practical solutions 191 109 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 6 3 10 4 14 5 20 6 36 7 30 8 35 9 23 10 To a very significant degree 12 11 Don't know 0 NA 109 Are source of relevant information on global good practices 204 96 1 10 1 To no degree at all 1 2 1 3 6 4 3 5 9 6 10 7 38 8 51 9 57 10 To a very significant degree 28 11 Don't know 0 NA 96 Are adequately disseminated 198 102 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 8 3 10 4 13 5 20 6 43 7 42 8 31 9 18 10 To a very significant degree 8 11 Don't know 0 NA 102 Are translated enough into local language 187 113 1 10 1 To no degree at all 4 2 4 3 4 4 9 5 12 6 21 7 26 8 35 9 34 10 To a very significant degree 38 11 Don't know 0 NA 113 Are adaptable to Brazil’s specific development challenges and country circumstances 192 108 1 10 1 To no degree at all 3 2 4 3 7 4 7 5 22 6 28 7 32 8 44 9 25 10 To a very significant degree 20 11 Don't know 0 NA 108 Are accessible (well written and easy to understand) 200 100 1 10 1 To no degree at all 3 2 2 3 8 4 8 5 9 6 14 7 35 8 44 9 35 10 To a very significant degree 42 11 Don't know 0 NA 100 Overall, how significant a contribution do you believe the World Bank Group's knowledge work and activities make to development results in your country? 217 83 1 10 1 Not significant at all 3 2 6 3 6 4 8 5 11 6 24 7 50 8 65 9 27 10 Very significant 17 11 Don't know 0 NA 83 Overall, how would you rate the technical quality of the World Bank Group's knowledge work and activities? 217 83 1 10 1 Very low technical quality 1 2 4 3 1 4 2 5 5 6 9 7 51 8 66 9 53 10 Very high technical quality 25 11 Don't know 0 NA 83 The World Bank Group disburses funds promptly 159 141 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 3 2 6 3 12 4 12 5 22 6 22 7 22 8 24 9 18 10 Strongly agree 18 11 Don't know 0 NA 141 The World Bank Group effectively monitors and evaluates the projects and programs it supports 186 114 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 2 3 4 4 7 5 10 6 14 7 38 8 49 9 31 10 Strongly agree 29 11 Don't know 0 NA 114 The World Bank Group’s approvals and reviews are done in a timely fashion 160 140 2 10 1 Strongly disagree 0 2 8 3 5 4 5 5 24 6 22 7 29 8 31 9 23 10 Strongly agree 13 11 Don't know 0 NA 140 The World Bank Group’s Environmental and Social Framework requirements are reasonable 148 152 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 3 2 7 3 5 4 4 5 13 6 15 7 30 8 35 9 24 10 Strongly agree 12 11 Don't know 0 NA 152 The World Bank Group’s conditions on its lending are reasonable 155 145 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 2 3 5 4 9 5 14 6 15 7 28 8 46 9 27 10 Strongly agree 7 11 Don't know 0 NA 145 The World Bank Group takes decisions quickly in Brazil 163 137 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 7 2 9 3 14 4 13 5 12 6 24 7 30 8 30 9 20 10 Strongly agree 4 11 Don't know 0 NA 137 Working with the World Bank Group increases Brazil’s institutional capacity 194 106 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 5 9 6 10 7 23 8 39 9 59 10 Strongly agree 42 11 Don't know 0 NA 106 Where country systems are adequate, the World Bank Group makes appropriate use of them 142 158 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 1 2 3 3 6 4 5 5 13 6 12 7 20 8 32 9 33 10 Strongly agree 17 11 Don't know 0 NA 158 The World Bank Group provides effective implementation support 176 124 1 10 1 Strongly disagree 2 2 2 3 5 4 7 5 7 6 15 7 24 8 52 9 34 10 Strongly agree 28 11 Don't know 0 NA 124 To what extent do you believe that the World Bank Group’s work helps to find solutions that promote private public partnerships in Brazil? 184 116 1 10 1 To no degree at all 5 2 3 3 4 4 6 5 14 6 20 7 46 8 46 9 27 10 To a very significant degree 13 11 Don't know 0 NA 116 Which of the following best describes the World Bank Group’s support in Brazil? 231 69 1 3 1 The World Bank Group is sufficiently selective and focuses on the most important development challenges in Brazil 113 2 The World Bank Group is not sufficiently selective in Brazil, and it is involved in too many areas of development. 46 3 Don’t know 72 NA 69 Engage more effectively with partners such as bilaterals, multilaterals, trust funds, UN 230 70 0 1 0 219 1 11 NA 70 Offer more innovative financial products 230 70 0 1 0 198 1 32 NA 70 Ensure greater selectivity in its work 230 70 0 1 0 219 1 11 NA 70 Provide more adequate data/knowledge/statistics/figures on Brazil’s economy 230 70 0 1 0 201 1 29 NA 70 Collaborate more effectively with Government clients 230 70 0 1 0 186 1 44 NA 70 Work faster 230 70 0 1 0 204 1 26 NA 70 Reduce the complexity of obtaining World Bank Group financing 230 70 0 1 0 181 1 49 NA 70 Help to bring discipline/effective supervision to implementation of World Bank Group projects 230 70 0 1 0 196 1 34 NA 70 Engage more effectively with civil society 230 70 0 1 0 195 1 35 NA 70 Increase the level of capacity development in the country 230 70 0 1 0 170 1 60 NA 70 Offer more innovative knowledge services 230 70 0 1 0 195 1 35 NA 70 Engage more directly with beneficiaries 230 70 0 1 0 203 1 27 NA 70 Improve the quality of its experts as related to Brazil’s specific challenges 230 70 0 1 0 218 1 12 NA 70 Engage more effectively with private sector 230 70 0 1 0 211 1 19 NA 70 Other 230 70 0 1 0 226 1 4 NA 70 When considering the combination of services that the World Bank Group offers in Brazil, and taking into account its limited level of resources, which ONE of the following do you believe the World Bank Group should offer more of in Brazil? 232 68 1 7 1 Financial services 71 2 Knowledge products 66 3 Convening services 17 4 None of the above 5 5 The combination is appropriate for Brazil 28 6 Reaching out to general public and advocating for reforms 26 7 Don’t know 19 NA 68 How frequently do you interact with the World Bank Group now in Brazil? 236 64 1 6 1 Never 24 2 Less than once a year 21 3 Once a year to a few times a year 95 4 Less than once a month 31 5 At least once a month 44 6 At least once a week 21 NA 64 Local television 236 64 0 1 0 202 1 34 NA 64 Internet 236 64 0 1 0 76 1 160 NA 64 Periodicals 236 64 0 1 0 182 1 54 NA 64 International radio 236 64 0 0 236 NA 64 Social media 236 64 0 1 0 183 1 53 NA 64 International newspapers 236 64 0 1 0 217 1 19 NA 64 International television 236 64 0 1 0 233 1 3 NA 64 Local newspapers 236 64 0 1 0 147 1 89 NA 64 Local radio 236 64 0 1 0 229 1 7 NA 64 Other 236 64 0 1 0 220 1 16 NA 64 World Bank Group’s website 234 66 0 1 0 167 1 67 NA 66 Social media 234 66 0 1 0 173 1 61 NA 66 World Bank Group’s publications and other written materials 234 66 0 1 0 164 1 70 NA 66 e-Newsletters 234 66 0 1 0 157 1 77 NA 66 World Bank Group’s seminars/workshops/conferences 234 66 0 1 0 141 1 93 NA 66 Direct contact with World Bank Group 234 66 0 1 0 178 1 56 NA 66 Which Internet connection do you use primarily when visiting a World Bank Group website? 226 74 1 2 1 High speed/WiFi 221 2 Dial-up 5 NA 74 Read, viewed or heard a story about the WBG in local media 219 81 1 4 1 Every few days 7 2 Every few weeks 27 3 Every few months 124 4 Not at all 61 NA 81 Read, viewed or heard a story about the WBG in global media 216 84 1 4 1 Every few days 7 2 Every few weeks 22 3 Every few months 131 4 Not at all 56 NA 84 Interacted with the WBG on Social Media 216 84 1 4 1 Every few days 6 2 Every few weeks 19 3 Every few months 58 4 Not at all 133 NA 84 Visited a WBG website 214 86 1 4 1 Every few days 9 2 Every few weeks 34 3 Every few months 117 4 Not at all 54 NA 86 Attended an event/conference hosted by the WBG 213 87 1 4 1 Every few days 1 2 Every few weeks 7 3 Every few months 95 4 Not at all 110 NA 87 Watched a webinar or online event hosted by the WBG 212 88 1 4 1 Every few days 3 2 Every few weeks 6 3 Every few months 51 4 Not at all 152 NA 88 Read some or all of a WBG research paper or publication 211 89 1 4 1 Every few days 3 2 Every few weeks 34 3 Every few months 121 4 Not at all 53 NA 89 Met professionally with WBG staff 217 83 1 4 1 Every few days 3 2 Every few weeks 18 3 Every few months 119 4 Not at all 77 NA 83 Read a WBG e-newsletter 217 83 1 4 1 Every few days 3 2 Every few weeks 17 3 Every few months 101 4 Not at all 96 NA 83 Have you requested information from the World Bank Group on its activities in the past year? If YES please go to Question G7; if NO please go to H1 219 81 1 2 1 Yes 92 2 No 127 NA 81 Were you able to obtain this information? 102 198 1 2 1 Yes 97 2 No 5 NA 198 Which of the following best describes your current affiliation? 294 6 1 20 1 Office of the President, Prime Minister 1 2 Office of Minister 6 3 Office of Parliamentarian 15 4 Employee of a Ministry, Ministerial Department or Implementation Agency 35 5 PMU overseeing implementation of project/ Consultant/Contractor working on World Bank Group supported project/program 27 6 Local Government Office or Staff 44 7 Bilateral Agency 6 8 Multilateral Agency 5 9 Private Sector Organization 21 10 Financial Sector/Private Bank 17 11 Private Foundation 7 12 NGO/Community Based Organization 34 13 Media 16 14 Independent Government Institution 19 15 Trade Union 0 16 Faith-Based Group 2 17 Youth Group 0 18 Academia/Research Institute/Think Tank 29 19 Judiciary Branch 5 20 Other 5 NA 6 Please identify the primary specialization of your work. 292 8 1 21 1 Water 34 2 Social protection and labor 6 3 Fragility, conflict and violence 5 4 Environment and natural resources 26 5 Public-private partnerships 12 6 Education 18 7 Health, nutrition, and population 16 8 Energy and extractives 4 9 Macroeconomics and fiscal management 28 10 Trade and competitiveness 6 11 Finance and markets 24 12 Gender 1 13 Transport and ICT 5 14 Urban, rural, and social development 22 15 Governance 14 16 Poverty 5 17 Jobs 0 18 Agriculture 11 19 Climate change 2 20 Generalist (specialized in multiple sectors) 40 21 Other 13 NA 8 Currently, do you professionally collaborate/work with the World Bank Group (IBRD, IFC, MIGA, ICSID) in your country? 293 7 1 2 1 Yes 94 2 No 199 NA 7 If yes, which of the following agencies of the World Bank Group do you primarily collaborate/work with in Brazil? 94 206 1 2 1 The World Bank (IBRD) 84 2 The International Finance Corporation (IFC) 10 3 The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) 0 NA 206 Do your projects involve both the World Bank and the IFC? 104 196 1 2 1 Yes 30 2 No 74 NA 196 Observer 294 6 0 1 0 240 1 54 NA 6 Use World Bank Group reports/data 294 6 0 1 0 191 1 103 NA 6 Engage in World Bank Group related/sponsored events/activities 294 6 0 1 0 176 1 118 NA 6 Collaborate as part of my professional duties 294 6 0 1 0 183 1 111 NA 6 Use World Bank Group website for information, data, research, etc. 294 6 0 1 0 228 1 66 NA 6 What’s your gender? 296 4 1 2 1 Female 90 2 Male 206 NA 4 What’s your age? 297 3 1 5 1 25 and under 3 2 26-35 47 3 36-45 84 4 46-55 75 5 56 and above 88 NA 3 Which best represents your geographic location? 296 4 1 5 1 North 13 2 South 23 3 Southeast 95 4 Northeast 73 5 Center-West 92 NA 4