IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / ALB_2008_MCC-TPE_V01_M
central

Thresholds I and II Performance Evaluation 2008-2012

Albania, 2008 - 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ALB_2008_MCC-TPE_v01_M
Producer(s)
Social Impact, Inc.
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jul 07, 2015
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
14613
Downloads
2939
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Access policy
  • Data Access
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    ALB_2008_MCC-TPE_v01_M

    Title

    Thresholds I and II Performance Evaluation 2008-2012

    Country
    Name Country code
    Albania ALB
    Study type

    Independent Performance Evaluation

    Abstract

    From 2006 to 2011, the government of Albania (GOA) received two Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) Threshold Programs totaling $29.6 million. Albania received its first Threshold Program (ATP1) in 2006. As a result of the success of ATP1, MCC approved a Stage II Threshold Program (ATP2) in 2008.

    The goal of the $13.9 million ATP1, which lasted from September 2006 to November 2008, was to improve Albania's performance on the control of corruption and business environment indicators by addressing tax administration, public procurement, and business registration legislation and processes. ATP2, a $15.7 million program in place from January 2009 to May 2011, expanded a similar approach of promoting e-government to business licensing and urban planning. ATP2 also supported reforms in public administration and judicial capacity, with the objective of achieving improvements on the control of corruption and rule of law policy indicators.

    Upon completion of ATP2, the MCC commissioned this final independent, ex-post performance evaluation to implement an independent and evidence-based study of both Albania threshold programs, examining program effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The evaluation team was directed to focus its efforts on the extent to which activities were undertaken; activities were fully implemented; implemented activities led to outcomes (or meaningful changes in knowledge, attitudes, and practices); implemented activities and outcomes have been sustained to date; and the likelihood that they will be sustained over the short- and long-term, as well as the cost effectiveness of the program activities, where feasible.

    The evaluation team collected and analyzed evidence to assess program effectiveness in achieving both output- and outcomelevel impacts. In particular, during the program review and evaluation implementation, the evaluation team explored the extent to which:

    • Activities were undertaken
    • Implementation progressed as planned
    • Activities were fully implemented
    • Implemented activities led to outcomes (or meaningful changes in knowledge, attitudes and practices)
    • Implemented activities and outcomes have been sustained, to date, and the likelihood that they will be sustained over the short- and long-term

    The evaluation team explored the factors (internal, including programmatic design and implementation issues, as well as external forces) that enabled or prevented the achievement of these outputs. In particular, and in line with the TOR, the evaluation team collected quantitative and qualitative information from different government representatives, business owners, civil society representatives, project implementers, U.S. government partners and others stakeholders regarding the extent to which the timeframe and Compact incentives hindered or accelerated policy improvements and the implementation of activities. For each ATP component, specific evaluation questions are explored in detail, in the appropriate sections of this report.

    Data Sources:

    • Document review
    • Business impact survey
    • Reference to ATP-funded surveys
    • Focus group discussions
    • Open-ended and semi-structured key informant interviews
    • GOA data
    • Third-party reports and surveys
    Kind of Data

    Other

    Unit of Analysis

    Individuals, focus groups, businesses, government data, documents

    Version

    Version Description

    Anonymized dataset for public distribution

    Scope

    Topics
    Topic
    Corruption
    Keywords
    Corruption Performance Evaluation

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    National coverage

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name
    Social Impact, Inc.
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name
    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    Business Impact Survey (BIS2) sample frame: 486 businesses; 4 partially-overlapping samples from 4 different (though partially overlapping) sampling frames: (1) VAT payers, (2) large (LTO) taxpayers, (3) businesses that obtain licensing and (4) businesses that participate in public procurement.

    Focus Group Discussions (Business Registration - VAT Payers) sample: Economic Operators that were registered after 2006 with NRC. Only 1 FG- in Tirana Businesses will vary by size and sector, but we will select only those businesses which have registered by themselves, without hiring an external person. Participants should be the individuals who personally interacted with the NRC to register.

    Focus Group Discussions (Small Businesses) sample: small businesses, with an annual turnover of up to 8 million LEK, (proportionately representing ranges: 0-2 million LEK, 2-5 Million LEK, and 2-8 Million LEK, paying local government (simplified tax) recruited through small business association in Korca and RDAs in Korca and Tirana. A mix of those registered before 2006 (with the court system) and after (with NRC). The sample will include representatives of various sectors (retail shops, food outlets, restaurants, service sector, taxi drivers, etc).

    Interviews with CSOs sample: Approximately 15 CSOs that were assisted by MCC ATP, but representing a mix: those having been trained/assisted with 1-on-1 capacity building/being part of the Coalition of CSO in support of Administrative Court/being part of the TCC/received monitoring grants (the latter, all 5, will be asked to participate in the interviews). Based on ISC reports we will ensure a mix of CSOs, which had recorded a progress (according to ISC assessment) and have not.

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    Business impact survey (BIS2): The survey covered medium and large businesses (value-added tax [VAT] payers).

    Focus group discussions (FGDs): The discussions included small businesses that are exempt from the VAT.

    Open-ended and semi-structured key informant interviews (KIIs): KIIs were conducted with government officials, USAID and U.S. Embassy personnel, independent experts, former project staff representatives of consortium members and selected business leaders. Site visits were conducted to project-implementation sites in Tirana and the regions.

    GOA data: Data, annual reports, and in-depth interviews were included from GOA agencies working with the ATPs.

    Third-party reports and surveys: Findings were used if relevant to assessing project outcomes and impact.

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End Cycle
    2008 2008 Business Impact Survey (BIS1)
    2012 2012 Business Impact Survey 2 (BIS2)
    Data Collectors
    Name Affiliation
    Institute for Development Research and Alternatives Subcontractor to Social Impact

    Access policy

    Location of Data Collection

    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    Archive where study is originally stored

    Millennium Challenge Corporation
    http://data.mcc.gov/evaluations/index.php/catalog/71
    Cost: None

    Data Access

    Citation requirements

    Melikyan, Lilit. Social Impact, Inc. Albania Threshold Programs Final Evaluation Report. 2012.

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email
    Monitoring & Evaluation Division Millennium Challenge Corporation impact-eval@mcc.gov

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_ALB_2008_MCC-TPE_v01_M

    Producers
    Name Role
    Millennium Challenge Corporation Metadata Producer
    Date of Metadata Production

    2014-03-27

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 1.0 (March 2014). The version uses an updated metadata template.
    Version 2.0 (April 2015). Edited version based on Version 01 (DDI-MCC-ALB-SI-THRESHOLDS-2013-v1.1) that was done by Millennium Challenge Corporation.

    Version notes

    Focus group with large companies and SMEs, with seven participants in Tirana (August 16, 2012); focus group with small businesses, with eight participants in Tirana (August 16, 2012); and focus group with small businesses, with eight participants in Korça (August 17, 2012).

    Back to Catalog
    IHSN Survey Catalog

    © IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.