IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / TZA_2014_SEDPIE-BLII_V01_M
central

Effectiveness of Education Service Delivery Impact Evaluation 2014

Tanzania, 2014
Reference ID
TZA_2014_SEDPIE-BLII_v01_M
Producer(s)
Shwetlena Sabarwal, Deon Filmer, James Habyarimana
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Sep 16, 2015
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
37761
Downloads
1377
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Identification
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Depositor information
  • Data Access
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    TZA_2014_SEDPIE-BLII_v01_M

    Title

    Effectiveness of Education Service Delivery Impact Evaluation 2014

    Subtitle

    SEDP II Project - Baseline II Survey

    Country
    Name Country code
    Tanzania TZA
    Study type

    1-2-3 Survey, phase 1

    Abstract

    The Tanzainia Effectiveness of Education Service Delivery Impact Evaluation 2014, SEDP II Project - Baseline II, has been designed to rigorously evaluate performance-based incentives for teachers and schools. Its main objective is to guide the design and implementation of performance-based non-monetary incentives for teachers under Government's priroritization program titled Big Results Now in Education (BRNed).

    Under this pilot incentive program, schools were divided into homogeneous groups based on geographic sub-area and performance at baseline (4-8 schools, with an average of 6, per group). Within each group, the top three schools with the highest index score (which combines the average score with the average gain in scores relative to baseline across three subjects) are scheduled to receive widely publicized recognition awards. In addition, the intervention will have a subject specific recognition award given to the best three teachers in a particular subject within the homogenous group.

    The original design also included experimentation with school report cards. However, based on Government consultations this treatment arm was dropped and replaced with a student-incentive treatment. The rationale behind this change is as follows:
    • Ministry of Education has requested comprehensive policy-guidance on the potential use of non-monetary incentives - including for teachers, schools, and students.
    • There is lack of consensus around potential use and design of school report cards.
    • Under the BRNed program, several types of accountability interventions are under consideration. The IE team is participating in these discussions.

    The treatment arm on student incentives is designed to test whether, and to what extent, the impact of teacher performance awards is augmented by providing performance-awards to students at the same time. The underlying rationale is to find mechanisms to align the incentives of students and teachers so that they work together towards the same goal.

    Student awards will be given to the most improved student in each student incentive school, averaged over Kiswahili, English, and Math. Prizes will also be awarded to the second and third most improved student in each school. These awards will be in the form of tablets, books, and certificates/medals.

    In addition, in the second year of implementation, there are two different features: 1) a pure Student Incentive group and 2) half of the Teacher Incentive group receives information on student performance and feedback suggestions. (is the TI + Feedback still valid).

    Kind of Data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Unit of Analysis

    Students, Teachers, and Schools

    Scope

    Notes

    Region
    Public vs. Private Schools
    Gender of the headmaster
    Age of the headmaster
    Headmaster teaches regular classes
    Headmaster has training in school management
    Headmaster rewards teacher who perform better
    Headmaster belongs to a teacher union
    School has electricity
    School has generator
    Number of working toilets
    Number of separate working toilets for girls
    Number of separate working toilets for teachers
    School receives capitation grant from the government
    Schools receives other grants from the government

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    Three regions of Tanzania Shinyanga (further split into Simiyu and Geita), Morogoro and Lindi

    Geographic Unit

    Schools

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name Affiliation
    Shwetlena Sabarwal World Bank
    Deon Filmer World Bank
    James Habyarimana Georgetown University
    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    Tiffany Tong World Bank Field work and Report writing
    Avichal Mahajan World Bank Report writing
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name
    World Bank Group

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The IE is being carried out in five regions and 420 schools (public and private). Sampled schools have been randomly assigned to one of four groups of schools.

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    Head-teacher questionnaire Student tests in English, Math, and Kswahili

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End
    2014-01-01 2014-03-30
    Data Collectors
    Name
    Ipsos-Synovate Tanzania
    Data Collection Notes

    • 409 schools were visited, data collection was successful with 396 schools
    • The purpose of the baseline visit was to: o Administer baseline student tests in English, Math, and Kiswahili
    o Create detailed student and teacher rosters (including contact information) for Form 3 students
    o Follow up on teacher and headmaster surveys by administering s similar but shortened set of question as last year.

    Depositor information

    Depositor
    Name Affiliation
    Shwetlena Sabarwal World Bank Group

    Data Access

    Citation requirements

    Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:

    • the Identification of the Primary Investigator
    • the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
    • the survey reference number
    • the source and date of download.

    Example,
    Deon Filmer, World Bank, James Habyarimana, Georgetown University, Shwetlena Sabarwal, World Bank. Effectiveness of Education Service Delivery Impact Evaluation 2014, SEDP II Project - Baseline II Survey (SEDPIE-BLII). Ref. TZA_2014_SEDPIE-BLII_v01_M. Dataset downloaded from [url] on [date].

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email
    Shwetlena Sabarwal World Bank Group ssabarwal@worldbank.org

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_TZA_2014_SEDPIE-BLII_v01_M_WB

    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    Development Data Group The World Bank Documentation of the DDI
    Date of Metadata Production

    2015-07-02

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 1.0 (July 2015)

    Back to Catalog
    IHSN Survey Catalog

    © IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.