Village Law: Technical Evaluation of Infrastructure Built with Village Funds 2018

Indonesia, 2018

Get Microdata

Reference ID

IDN_2018_TEIBVF_v01_M

Producer(s)

World Bank

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Jan 16, 2021

Last modified

Jan 16, 2021

Page views

8633

Downloads

204

Data file: BPS_FT_(0-7)_D_public

VILLAGE LAW 2018 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
Infrastructure Type D – ROAD, DRAINAGE and RETAINING WALL

Cases:	94
Variables:	245

Variables

kodedesa

BPS unique village code

infra_type

Type of infrastructure

infra_VID

Village level identifying infrastructure number

infra_ID

Unique infrastructure number

yr_constr

Year of infrastructure construction

type_constr

Type of infrastructure construction

constr_modality

Modality of infrastructure construction

num_hh

Number of households benefitting from infrastructure construction

num_benef

Number of beneficiaries benefitting from infrastructure construction

remote

Remote/not remote status of infrastructure construction location, by village

date_inspect

Date of infrastructure construction inspection

A_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 0-100 m

A_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 0-100 m

B_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 100-200 m

B_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 100-200 m

C_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 200-300 m

C_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 200-300 m

D_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 300-400 m

D_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 300-400 m

E_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_3

Missing drainage structure, # from road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 400-500 m

E_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 400-500 m

F_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 500-600 m

F_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 500-600 m

G_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 600-700 m

G_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 600-700 m

H_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 700-800 m

H_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 700-800 m

I_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 800-900 m

I_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 800-900 m

J_Seg_1

Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_2

Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_3

Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_4

Improper construction materials, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_5

Slippery when wet, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_6

Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_7

Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_8

Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_9

Narrow width, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_10

Surface below standard, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_11

Low shoulder, % of road segment 900-1,000 m

J_Seg_12

Safety concerns, # from road segment 900-1,000 m

Structure

Retaining Wall (structural integrity), evaluation result

Holes

Retaining Wall (weep holes), evaluation result

Eros

Retaining Wall (erosion protection), evaluation result

ConstrTechWall

Retaining Wall (construction techniques), evaluation result

Dimensions

Retaining Wall (dimensions), evaluation result

LayoutCulvert

Culvert (layout), evaluation result

ConstrTechCulvert

Culvert (construction techniques), evaluation result

LayoutBridge

Small Bridge (layout), evaluation result

ConstrTechBridge

Small Bridge (construction techniques), evaluation result

OpMain

Operation and maintenance, evaluation result

Constr

Construction quality, assessment

DesignCom

Design completeness, assessment

Funct

Functionality, assessment

Design

Adequacy of design consultation with users

File

File completeness (meeting notes, land donation records, design drawings, etc.

EngNotes

Kabupaten engineer and TF inspection notes to file

InspForm

Final sub-project inspection report, in file and fully completed

Drawing

As-built drawing

QualFac

Quality of technical facilitation

FreqVisit

Frequency of TF site visits (number of visits)

ConstrPer

Construction period (in months)

Env

Environmental Practices (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment

Land

Land Acquisition (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment

Social

Social Safegaurds (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment

Length

Road (length), in m

Width

Road (width), in m

Earth

Road Material (contains earth)

Gravel

Road Material (contains gravel)

Concrete

Road Material (contains concrete)

Asphalt

Road Material (contains asphalt)

LengthCulvert

Drainage Culvert (length), spot improvements in m

WidthCulvert

Drainage Culvert (width), spot improvements in m

DiameterCulvert

Drainage Culvert (diameter), spot improvements in m

LengthChannel

Drainage Channel (length), spot improvements in m

WidthChannel

Drainage Channel (width), spot improvements in m

LengthWall

Retaining Wall (length), spot improvements in m

HeightWall

Retaining Wall (height), spot improvements in m

BudgetRoad

Road Installation Cost (budget), in IDR

ActualRoad

Road Installation Cost (actual), in IDR / square meter

StandardRoad

Road Installation Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / square

BudgetDrain

Drainage Installation Cost (budget), in IDR

ActualDrain

Drainage Installation Cost (actual), in IDR / meter

StandardDrain

Drainage Installation Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / met

BudgetWall

Wall Installation Cost (budget), in IDR

ActualWall

Wall Installation Cost (actual), in IDR / meter

StandardWall

Wall Installation Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / meter

PerfRepairs

Major repairs or rehabilitation performed

ReqRepairs

Major repairs or rehabilitation required

EnvDam

Cause of Damage, environmental

DesDam

Cause of Damage, poor design

ConstrDam

Cause of Damage, poor construction

MatDam

Cause of Damage, materials

OMDam

Cause of Damage, poor operations & maintanence

CostRepair

Repair Costs (actual)

CostEst

Repair Costs (estimated)

Repair

Repair performed by

Date

Repair date

Maintain_1

Routine Maintenance (pot hole / surface repair)

Maintain_2

Routine Maintenance (erosion control of shoulders)

Maintain_3

Routine Maintenance (erosion control of slopes)

Maintain_4

Routine Maintenance (drainage)

Maintain_5

Routine Maintenance (signs)

Maintain_6

Routine Maintenance (minor repair to culverts / walls)

Maintain_7

Routine Maintenance (regrading and re-gravelling)

Maintain_8

Routine Maintenance (repair scour checks)

Maintain_9

Plan

Operation and Maintanence Plan (has a multi-year plan)

Link

Operation and Maintanence Plan (linked to line ministries)

Division

Operation and Maintanence Plan (has clear division of responsibilities and costs

CostsRoutine

Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, routine)

CostsCapital

Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, capital repairs)

Place

Operation and Maintanence Committee (in place and functioning)

Fee

Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee in place)

Services

Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee for specified services)

Contributions

Operation and Maintanence Committee (contributions from other sources)

Current

Operation and Maintanence Committee (current funds within operation and maintane

Afford

Operation and Maintanence Committee (affordibility of user fees)

Inputs

Operation and Maintanence Committee (government inputs to schools and medical cl

CommInput

Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from community)

GovInput

Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from government)

Training

Operation and Maintanence Training (O&M training received)

Ongoing

Operation and Maintanence Training (ongoing capacity development)

BudgetTrain

Operation and Maintanence Training (annual training budget)

Flood

Climate Resiliency (safe from flooding)

ErosFT4

Climate Resiliency (erosion protection measures are sufficient)

Landslide

Climate Resiliency (low landslide risk; no steep slopes)

Fire

Climate Resiliency (low forest fire risk; clear area between building and forest

IssueDesign_1

Issue Design (lack of construction details on drawings)

IssueDesign_2

Issue Design (lack of accurate measurements on drwg)

IssueDesign_3

Issue Design (improper cross section)

IssueDesign_4

Issue Design (drainage considerations)

IssueConstr_1

Issue Construction (improper materials)

IssueConstr_2

Issue Construction (lack of compaction)

IssuePipe_1

Issue Pipe, Culver and Channel (dimensions/layout)

IssuePipe_2

Issue Pipe, Culver and Channel (improperly buried)

IssuePipe_3

Issue Pipe, Culver and Channel (erosion protection)

IssueSteel_1

Issue Steel Reinforcement (short development length in steel reinforcing)

IssueSteel_2

Issue Steel Reinforcement (improperly bent reinforcing cage stirrup bars)

IssueSteel_3

Issue Steel Reinforcement (lack of tie bar wiring)

IssueConcrete_1

Issue Concrete (absence of concrete mix design)

IssueConcrete_2

Issue Concrete (honeycombing in concrete)

IssueConcrete_3

Issue Concrete (exposed/shallow reinforcing steel)

IssueConcrete_4

Issue Concrete (improper materials or poorly mixed concrete)

IssueWall_1

Issue Wall (foundation/structural integrity)

IssueWall_2

Issue Wall (batter)

IssueWall_3

Issue Wall (wep holes)

IssueWall_4

Issue Wall (poor drainage at foot of wall)

IssueWall_5

Issue Wall (finishing)

IssueSlope_1

Issue Slopes (fill slope - 1 vert.:4 horiz. max)

IssueSlope_2

Issue Slopes (cut slope - 1 vert.:2 horiz. max)

Priority

Did the process of infrastructure prioritization within the village follow Villa

Procure

Did the procurement process (either swakelola or contractor) follow all laws and

Participate

How many persons have been participating in these meetings and how effective are

Women

Women's participation in prioritization, procurement and community meetings

Total: 245

Back to Catalog