Value |
Category |
Because customs won't open a private warehouse for clearance |
|
Because of complicated administration for getting the licence |
|
Because of complicated procedure for obtaining the licence for in-house clearance |
|
Because of products that require fast clearance and are not stored for being perishable |
|
Because of the law which is not clear regarding when it is allowed to do in-house clearance |
|
Because the computer system is still not operational, downtime in the computer system |
|
Big clients still haven't submitted an application |
|
Clients are not informed enough about in-house clearance |
|
Clients are not interested in that |
|
Clients are satisfied now |
|
Clients can do that, not forwarders |
|
Clients don't want this, they don't want to be responsible for everything |
|
Customs zone and customs service need to be established |
|
DK |
|
Due to technical possibilities, not trained enough customs officers |
|
Enterprises are still not able to do this, they have to have more extensive turnover. |
|
Forwarders don't meet the legal requirements for in-house clearance |
|
I don't have adequate conditions |
|
I don't know why they are not using it, it's a relatively new term |
|
I don't know, I don't think they have qualified and trained staff for that |
|
It doesn't exist |
|
It is not applicable to our business operations |
|
It is not economically justified to get that permission |
|
It is not introduced here |
|
It is not widespread enough |
|
It is still not widely applied |
|
It's a privilege of the big ones, it's a problem to get bank guarantees |
|
It's not much of a relief, we have no need for it |
|
Maybe they are not aware of it or it has no advantages over standard clearance |
|
My clients can't do that |
|
My enterprise doesn't do in-house clearance |
|
Natural persons don't use it, it's not allowed |
|
No one has asked for approval yet |
|
No, we are a small enterprise |
|
None of the clients asked for it |
|
Not big enough enterprises |
|
Only big companies do that |
|
Only huge enterprises have it, we are small |
|
Our clients don't have the conditions for that |
|
Our clients have small shipments |
|
Our clients still don't have the licence of customs administration |
|
Shipments are small and they don't require in-house clearance |
|
The customs system is such that only some forwarders can do in-house clearance |
|
The procedure is still not settled |
|
The procedure of obtaining a license for in-house clearance is too serious and small enterprises can't obtain it |
|
Their clients are not that strong, this is not allowed easily |
|
There are no basic conditions for in-house clearance |
|
There are no conditions |
|
There are no conditions available for that type of clearance |
|
There are no required conditions |
|
There is no completed program for representatives |
|
There is no sufficient and necessary information |
|
These are small enterprises |
|
They are in the process of obtaining one client |
|
They are not allowed |
|
They are not informed and educated enough |
|
They are not informed enough about in-house clearance |
|
They are not used to using in-house clearance |
|
They are not using it |
|
They are still not familiar with in-house clearance |
|
They are too small to have in-house clearance |
|
They can't do it, it doesn't suit them |
|
They can't meet the conditions for in-house clearance |
|
They don't have an authorized customs officer. They are not a big importer so they don't meet the conditions (quota) to do in-house clearance. |
|
They don't have big clients |
|
They don't have big work volume that requires in-house clearance, their work is dispersed |
|
They don't have some service to do it for them |
|
They don't have sufficient number of shipments to do in-house clearance |
|
They don't have sufficient work volume |
|
They don't have that much goods, it's easier for them this way |
|
They don't have the conditions for in-house clearance |
|
They don't meet the conditions |
|
They don't meet the conditions of various clearance approaches. |
|
They don't need it |
|
They don't use it because it's easier for clients, they have no obligations... |
|
They don't want to deal with it |
|
They don't want to open their warehouses, it costs more than classical clearance |
|
They finish things more quickly in customs offices |
|
They have no need for it |
|
They have to have agentry licence, it's an extra expenditure |
|
They haven't submitted an application for in-house clearance |
|
They probably don't have the licence for in-house clearance |
|
They still don't have the right staff and software, so we are intermediary customs officers. |
|
They still haven't submitted an application for granting |
|
This is not approved by the customs administration |
|
This was introduced relatively recently, it requires licences, training, education |
|
Vole spin &co |
|
We are not familiar enough with this procedure |
|
We don't have mass shipments |
|
We don't have such clients |
|
We don't have the conditions to do that |
|
We don't have truck, but air shipments and they have to enter customs |
|
We don't meet the conditions, there need to be at least 50 clearances a day, we still don't have that many. |
|
We have to have a customs officer because we have cumulative shipments |
|
We have to have the logistics for that, we generally have small clients |
|
We haven't informed them about that, they are not informed. Only big forwarders use in-house clearance. |
|
We re not allowed, we are not that big, only big companies are doing this |
|
We still have small turnover, but we are planning to start next year. We have to have 50 clearances a month. |
|
We were not informed |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.