MWI_2014_PECDIE-EL_v01_M
Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015
Endline Survey
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Malawi | MWI |
1-2-3 Survey, phase 3
The Government of Malawi recognizes that investment in early childhood development (ECD) is a cost-effective strategy to meet its development objectives in areas of health, nutrition, education, and social protection. In Malawi, ECD is delivered through an extensive network of community initiated and owned centers for the most vulnerable children under the age of six, known as Community-based Childcare Centers (CCBCs). The recent global food, fuel, and financial crises hit Malawi hard. Constrained government budgets and activities for ECD have jeopardized the service delivery of the existing ECD centers which cover about a third of all 3-6 year old children. From 2010 to 2012, the Protecting Early Childhood Development Project (PECD) aimed to mitigate the negative effects of the recent global crises on young children and to start building foundations against future crises.
A rigorous impact evaluation of the PECD project in Malawi has been designed to test interactions between existing approaches to improve quality in the preschool sector to maximize effects for primary school readiness. The impact evaluation will test the effectiveness of different approaches to improve quality of ECD Centers, parenting knowledge and practices, and child development and school readiness. The evaluation follows a cluster-randomized control trial design in which 199 CBCCs in four of Malawi’s 28 districts were randomized after baseline into one of three treatment arms or to a control arm.
This Impact Evaluation (IE) has three primary research objectives, which are both academically important and pertinent for policy makers in low-income countries:
The baseline survey was conducted between September 30, 2011 and February 17, 2012. Follow-up (midline) data was collected between May 13, 2013 and October, 2013. Part 1 of the endline survey, consisting of CBCC questionnaires and enumerator observations at the CBCC, was collected between May and July 2014. Part 2 of the endline survey, involving administration of the mother/guardian questionnaire, and measurement of child development, took place between January and March 2015.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The scope of the endline survey includes:
Data was collected in Balaka, Thyolo, Nkhatabay, and Dedza districts.
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Berk Ozler | World Bank |
Michelle J. Neuman | University of Pennsylvania |
Lia Fernald | University of California, Berkeley |
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Christin McConnell | World Bank |
Patricia Kariger | Univeristy of California, Berkeley |
Name |
---|
Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund |
Early Learning Partnership |
This study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial with one control arm and three treatment arms. Four study districts (Balaka, Thyolo, Dedza, Nhkata Bay) that provide adequate representation of the regions in Malawi were chosen by the MGCSW for inclusion in the study. Sample size calculations for a multi-site, cluster-randomized trial estimated that 240 CBCCs and 12 children from each of the CBCCs would be necessary to detect small to moderate impacts (0.2 to 0.25 standard deviations) on child development measures (the PPVT, specifically) with 95% confidence and 80% power. A full listing of all CBCCs eligible to receive the intervention from the MGCSW produced only 199 CBCCs in the four districts, however; therefore, all 199 CBCCs were included in the study.
Randomization was conducted in each district separately to ensure that equal numbers of CBCCs were allocated to each of the study arms within each district. To ensure a balance of important baseline characteristics, which are strongly prognostic of cognitive development outcomes of interest, a "block randomization" procedure was used. Information about the variables used for blocking (child anthropometrics and scores on developmental tests) was collected during the baseline survey.
The baseline sample includes 2,120 children, ages 3-4 years, attending the CBCCs from the village. These children were randomly selected (blocked by age and sex) from the group of children attending the CBCCs on the day the baseline data collection teams visited the school. Therefore, selection bias should not be an issue. All 199 CBCCs which participated in the baseline survey were included in the endline sample.
The PECD project focuses on four interventions:
Control and treatment groups are to receive the following interventions:
The child respondents (and their respective mothers/guardians) to be interviewed and tested for the PECD endline survey were amongst the initial baseline sample. During the endline (part 1) survey in May-July 2014, the location of all 2,120 baseline children was asked to the CBCCs and communities. The endline sample was determined by taking all children that still live in their original communities (as of mid-2014) as well as a sample of those children who have moved outside their original community and were determined to be trackable. It was expected that child assessments to be administered to all children in the endline sample, regardless of their current location.
Part 1 endline PECD survey included following instruments:
Part 2 endline PECD survey included following instruments:
Start | End | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2014-05-29 | 2014-07-02 | Endline (CBCC-level) |
2015-01-19 | 2015-03-31 | Endline (mother and child level) |
Name |
---|
Wadonda Consult |
Data collection was overseen by an Education Specialist from the World Bank and local ECD expert from who conducted spot-checks in the field. Spot-checks on data entry were conducted by a local consultant from the World Bank.
Part 1 endline data collection took place over a period of one day at each Community-based Childcare Center (CBCC). Upon arriving at a center, two enumerators study team introduced the study and administered the CBCC questionnaire to the CBCC director, conducted CBCC observations, and completed the CBCC caregiver interview.
The use of the datasets must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
Example:
Berk Ozler, World Bank; Michelle J. Neuman, University of Pennsylvania; Lia Fernald, Univeristy of California, Berkeley. Malawi Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015, Endline Survey. Ref. MWI_2014_PECDIE-EL_v01_M. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Christin McConnell | World Bank | cmcconnell@worldbank.org |
DDI_MWI_2014_PECDIE-EL_v02_M_WB
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Development Data Group | World Bank | Study documentation |
Education - GP | World Bank | Study documentation |
2015-07-28
v01 (July 2015)
v02 ( March 2019) - with variable level metadata