Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015
Malawi, 2014 - 2015
Get MicrodataCreated on
Mar 29, 2019
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
50768
15. comments regarding visits (csq15)
Data file: r3.child.child_assessments_noid
Overview
Valid:
1971
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
285
End:
384
Width:
100
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| ADMINISTERED SUCCESFULLY | |
| ALL ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED | |
| ALL CHILD ASSESSMENTS WERE COMPLETED | |
| ALL TEST WERE DONE | |
| ALL TESTS HAVE BEEN ADMINISTERED | |
| ALL TESTS WERE ADMINISTERED | |
| ALL TESTS WERE COMPLETD | |
| ALL THE RESPONDENTS TOOK THEIR TIME DURING THE ACTIVITIES (CHILD AND MOTHER) | |
| ALL THE RESPONDENTS WERE FLEXIBLE AND PARTICIPATED IN THE ACTIVITIES. | |
| ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED | |
| BRILLIANT CHILD | |
| CHILD CHANGED SURNAME TO JOHN FROM PASALIYAPA BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS NAME BELON TO HER GRANDFATHER. | |
| CHILD COOPERATIVE. | |
| CHILD DOENT ATTEND SCHOOL EVER SINCE LAST ACADEMIC YEAR. EVEN THIS YEAR DINT CAME TO SCHOOL. | |
| CHILD DOESN'T KNOW HOW READ DOUBLE NUMBERS I.E ANY NUMBER ABOVE 9 (CHILD IT BY HIMSELF) | |
| CHILD FAILED TRAINING ITEMS ON PPVT | |
| CHILD HAS MENTAL PROBLEMS | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT HAD A LOT OF DIFFICULTIES UNDERSTANDING INSTRUCTIONS EVEN AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS. | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT SHOWED LITTLE ATTENTION AND INTEREST THOUGH SHE STILL COOPERATED | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT WAS ATTENTIVE AND ACTIVE. | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT WAS GOOD AT ANSWERING | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT WAS GOOD THOUGH HE WAS SICK. | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT WAS GOOD THROUGH HIS ATTENTION OFTEN WANDERED. | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT WAS SICK SO SOMETIMES WAS SLOW | |
| CHILD RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD. | |
| CHILD VERY COOPERATIVE. | |
| CHILD WAS MOVING AROUND ALOT AND SHE WAS OFF TASK MOST OF THE INTERVIEW TIME. | |
| CHILD WAS SHY BUT HAPPY WITH COMPLETING THE TASK. | |
| CHILD WAS VERY INTERACTIVE. CHILD IS LIVING WITH A NEW GUARDIAN.AISHA&ALEFA ARE COUSINS | |
| CHILD WAS VERY SLOW. | |
| CHILD/RESPONDENT WAS NOT INTERESTED | |
| CHIULD WAS SO SICK SO COULD NOT DO TESTS AT A GOOD PACE | |
| COMPLETE | |
| COMPLETED | |
| COMPLETED ALL CHILD ASSESSMENTS | |
| COMPLETED ALL TESTS | |
| COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY | |
| COMPLETED THE CHILD ASSESSMENTS | |
| COMPLETED. | |
| COMPLETELY DONE | |
| COMPLETELY DONE ALTHOUGH THE CHILD WAS PLAYFULL | |
| COMPLETELYY DONE | |
| COOPERATIVE AND FRIENDLY ENJOYED THE TASK | |
| COOPERATIVE AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK | |
| COOPERATIVE AND VERY FRIENDLY AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK.GOOD | |
| DONE | |
| DONE WELL | |
| DONE. | |
| DURING M/G INTERVIEW, THE M/G SAID CHILD IS STD 3 AND LAST YR WAS IS STD 2,CURRENTLY ALSO IN STD 2, | |
| EGMA PARTIALLY COMPLETE BECAUSE THE CHILD DID NOT KNOW THE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NUMBERS. | |
| EXCELLENT | |
| FAIR | |
| GOOD | |
| GOOD HE ENJOYED THE TASK. | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW THE CHILD WAS COORPERATIVE | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW. | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW. CHILD IIS A LITTLE AGRESSIVE | |
| GOOD INTERVIW | |
| GOOD RESPONDENT | |
| GOOD TRANSILATION BY M/G | |
| GOOD. | |
| GREAT | |
| HE WAS VERY ATTENTIVE TO THE TASKS. | |
| INSTRUCTIONS WERE CLEAR, THE CHILD PAID FULL ATTENTION | |
| INTERVIEW AND ADMINISTRATION OF TESTS WAS DONE SUCCESSFULLY. | |
| INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | |
| INTERVIEW WAS GOOD BUT CHILD WAS NOT INTERACTIVE ENOUGH. | |
| INTERVIEW WAS GOOD&CHILD WAS ENTHUASTIC& EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASKS. | |
| INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL ONLY THAT EGMA WAS PARTIALLY COMPLETED BECAUSE THE BECAUSE THE CHILD FAILED | |
| INTERVIEW WENT WELL | |
| IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE M/G IS 'EPHELO" BUT REAL NAME IS EHTEL. | |
| IT WAS A GOOD INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS A GOOD VISIT | |
| IT WAS A NICE INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS AN AWESOME VISIT.THE PARTICIPANTS WHERE WELCOMING | |
| IT WAS CONDUCTED WELL | |
| IT WAS CONDUCTED WELL | |
| IT WAS DONE WELL AND COMPLETE, THE CHILD ENJOYED THE TEST. | |
| IT WAS FINE | |
| IT WAS GOOD | |
| IT WAS GOOD AND SUCCESSFUL | |
| IT WAS GOOD AND THE CHILD ENJOYS ALOT PPVT TEST. | |
| IT WAS GOOD BUT DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF THE WAETHER | |
| IT WAS GOOD ONLY THAT THE RESPONDENT DIDNT KNOW NUMBERS,SINCE HE IS IN FIRST CLASS AT PRIMARY SCHOOL | |
| IT WAS GOOD, ALTHOUGH THE CHILD WAS SHY | |
| IT WAS GOOD, THE CHILD WAS SOMETIMES EASY TO ENGAGE WITH AND SHOWED LITTLE INTEREST IN TASK. | |
| IT WAS GOOD,THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE WITH AND EVERYTHING WAS FINE | |
| IT WAS GOOD. | |
| IT WAS GOOD; THE CHILD WAS SO FRIENDLY AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK& VERY COOPERATIVE | |
| IT WAS GREAT, THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASK AND PAID ATTENTION TO THE INSTRUCTION | |
| IT WAS HARD | |
| IT WAS NICE | |
| IT WAS OKEY | |
| IT WAS REALLY VERY BAD, THE CHILD HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THE TESTS, SO I HAD TO TRY HARD. | |
| IT WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| IT WAS SUCCESSFUL, EVERY THING WENT WELL | |
| IT WAS SUCCESSFUL, THE CHILD WAS CLEVER AND EASY TO ENGAGE WITH AND ENJOYED THE TEST | |
| IT WAS SUCCESSFULL,THOUGH SOME OF THE TIME THE CHILD HAD LITTLE INTEREST IN TASK. | |
| IT WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD AND SUCCESSFUL | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD INTERVIEW AND THE CHILD WAS VERY PARTICIPATIVE | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD. | |
| IT WAS VERY INTERESTING INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS VERY VERY GOOD | |
| IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED | |
| IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED AND THE RESPONDENT WAS COORPARATIVE | |
| IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED AND THE RESPONDENT WELL RESPONDED | |
| IT WENT WELL | |
| JUST GREAT. | |
| MIND WANDERED ALOT | |
| NICE INTERVIEW | |
| NONE | |
| NOTE | |
| NOTES | |
| NOTES. | |
| PERFECT | |
| RESPONDEN HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING INSTRUCTIONS | |
| RESPONDENT DIDNT SHOW ANY INTEREST, SHE WAS SLOW. | |
| RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE THOUGH WAS HUNGRY. | |
| RESPONDENT WAS EASY WHEN ENGAGING TESTS | |
| RESPONDENT WAS GOOD | |
| RESPONDENT WAS REALLY GOOD | |
| RESPONDENT WAS SLOW AND RELACTANT WHEN ATTEMPTING SOME TESTS | |
| RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD | |
| RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD AND EASILY DID THE TESTS GIVEN TO HER. | |
| SHE WAS VERY SHY TO COMPLETE THE TEST | |
| SUCCEFFULLY TRACKED | |
| SUCCEFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCEFULLY DONE | |
| SUCCEFULLY TRACKED | |
| SUCCESFUL | |
| SUCCESFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCESFUL INTERVIEW. | |
| SUCCESFUL INTERVIEWS | |
| SUCCESFULLY ADMINISTERED | |
| SUCCESFULLY DONE | |
| SUCCESIFULLY COMPLETED. | |
| SUCCESS | |
| SUCCESSFUL | |
| SUCCESSFUL GOOD. | |
| SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW. | |
| SUCCESSFUL ONE | |
| SUCCESSFUL TRACKED | |
| SUCCESSFUL VISIT | |
| SUCCESSFUL. | |
| SUCCESSFULL | |
| SUCCESSFULL COMPLETED | |
| SUCCESSFULL INTERVIEWS | |
| SUCCESSFULLY | |
| SUCCESSFULLY ADMINISTERED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE. | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE. THE CHILD ENJOYED THE TEST. | |
| SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED AND ASSESSED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED AND ASSESSED. | |
| SUCCESSFULY COMPLETED | |
| SUCCESSFULY DONE | |
| SUCCESSSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCESSFUL | |
| SUCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| TEST WASNT COMPLETED COZ RESPONDENT COULDNT TALK, RESPONDENT IS ABLE TO TALK BUT REFUSED TO ATTEMPT | |
| THE CHILD CHOWED INTEREST IN THE TESTS CONDUCTED. | |
| THE CHILD ENJOYED THE ASSESSMENTS | |
| THE CHILD IS STUMMER AND THERFORE HE COULD TAKE MORE THAN 5SECONDS TO RESPOND ESPECIALLY IN EGMA, | |
| THE CHILD PAID ATTENTION | |
| THE CHILD PAID FULL ATTENTION AND SHOWED INTERESTS IN THE TASKS. | |
| THE CHILD PAID FULL ATTENTION, THERE WERE NO DISTURBANCES | |
| THE CHILD PARTICIPATED NICELY&HE WAS CAPABLE OF DOING SOME TESTS WHILE OTHER TEST DID NOT DO MUCH | |
| THE CHILD RESPONDENT WAS STAMMERING | |
| THE CHILD SHOWED INTEREST AND PAID ATTENTION | |
| THE CHILD SHOWED INTEREST IN THE TESTS | |
| THE CHILD SHOWED INTEREST IN THE TESTS CONDUCTED | |
| THE CHILD WAS COOPERATIVE | |
| THE CHILD WAS EASILY DISTRACTED FROM TEST ACTIVITIES. | |
| THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASKS | |
| THE CHILD WAS EASY TO ENGAGE IN TASKS AND SHOWED INTEREST. | |
| THE CHILD WAS ENGANGED WITH ALL THE TASK | |
| THE CHILD WAS SICK, IT WASNT A SIMPLE THING TO DRAW ATTENTION OF THE CHILD ON THE TASK. | |
| THE CHILD WAS SO MUCH EXCITED WITH THE TESTS | |
| THE CHILD WAS VERY COURAGEOUS | |
| THE CHILD WAS VERY SHY AND HE ENJOYED THE TASK. | |
| THE CHILS HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THE TASK. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS CHALLENGING, THE CHILD HAD PROBLEMS IN UNDERSTANDING AND DOING THE TASKS. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WELL | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD ALTHOUGH THE KID WAS STAMMERING LITTLE BIT | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD, THE CHILD WAS VERY ACTIVE. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT,THE CHILD WAS VERY COOPERATIVE | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCTED | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS WAS OKAY AND THE RESPONDENT PAYS MUCH ATTENTION TO THE QUESTIONS | |
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL. | |
| THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL | |
| THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL AND THE CHILD REALLY PAID MUCH ATTENTION DESPITE FAILING SOME TESTS. | |
| THE LANGAUGE WAS A BARRIER, THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND. | |
| THE RESPONDENT HAS DIFFICULTIES WITH FOAM TRIANGLES. | |
| THE RESPONDENT IS ALWAYS IN AND OUT OF THE HOSPITAL DUE TO ILLNESS | |
| THE RESPONDENT WAS FLEXIBLE AND PARTICIPATED IN ALL ACTIVITIES. | |
| THE VISIT WAS VERY SUCESSFUL | |
| THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WAS A SUCCESS, HAD AN INTELLIGENT CHILD ALTOGETHER. | |
| THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WAS WELL DONE | |
| THE WHOLE INTERVIEW WENT WELL. | |
| THOUGH THE CHILD SIGNMENT SHY AND RELUCTANT TO PERFOM THE TEST HE STILL MANAGES TO FINISH ALL TEST | |
| TRACKED AND ASSESSED | |
| TRACKING SUCCESSFUL | |
| VERY GOOD | |
| VERY GOOD CHILD,SHE UNDERSTAND THINGS | |
| VERY SUCCESSFUL AND BOTH THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD WERE VERY COOPERATIVE. | |
| WAS GOOD | |
| WAS GOOD INTERVIEW THE CHILD WAS ABLE TO PERFORM ALL THE TASKS. | |
| WAS GOOD INTERVIEW. | |
| WAS GOOD SHE IS SO FRIENDLY | |
| WAS GOOD. | |
| WAS GOOD; THE CHILD WAS SO FRIENDLY. | |
| WAS GREAT | |
| WAS JUST A GREAT KID BUT HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THINGS | |
| WAS JUST FINE THE CHILD SHOW INTEREST ON PERFORMING TASK. | |
| WAS JUST GOOD | |
| WAS SUCCESSFUL BUT NOT EASY | |
| WAS SUCCESSFULY DONE. | |
| WE HAVE A NEW M/G MARY MANDA.THE OLD M/G WENT TO TANZANIA | |
| WELL CONDUCTED | |
| WELL CONDUCTED BUT DID NOT PROCEED WITH EGMA BECAUSE TASK IN EGMA WAS FAILED. | |
| WELL CONDUCTED ON THE SECOND REVISIT | |
| WELL CONDUCTED. | |
| WELL COUNDUCTED | |
| WELL DONE | |
| WELL DONE, THE RESPONDENT WAS COORPERATE AND THE PARTICIPATION WAS OKAY. | |
| WELL DONE. | |
| WENT WELL | |
| WENT WELL THE CHILD THE CHILD ENJOYED THE TASK. | |
| WENT WELL. |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.