Afrobarometer Survey 2016, Round 7
Uganda, 2016 - 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2016_AFB-R7_v01_M
Producer(s)
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
Created on
Oct 14, 2021
Last modified
Oct 14, 2021
Page views
5717
- Data files
- uga_r7_data.sav
Q83b_UGA. Improve on transparency during declaration of election results (Q83B_UGA)
Data file: uga_r7_data.sav
Overview
Valid:
1200
Invalid:
-
Minimum:
-1
Maximum:
9
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
1010
End:
1011
Width:
2
Range:
-1 - 9
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
The quality of Uganda’s elections have been described by many stakeholders including the opposition, ruling party, civil society, media, and voters, as poor due to allegations of election irregularities and mismanagement. I am going to read from a list of proposals aimed at improving the quality of Uganda’s elections. For each of the following proposals, please tell me whether you disagree or agree?
- Improve on transparency during tallying, transmission and declaration of election results.
- Improve on transparency during tallying, transmission and declaration of election results.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Missing | 3 |
0.3%
|
| 1 | Strongly disagree | 9 |
0.8%
|
| 2 | Disagree | 4 |
0.3%
|
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 18 |
1.5%
|
| 4 | Agree | 381 |
31.8%
|
| 5 | Strongly agree | 773 |
64.4%
|
| 8 | Refused | 1 |
0.1%
|
| 9 | Don’t Know | 11 |
0.9%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Interviewer: Probe for strength of opinion.