Afrobarometer Survey 2018, Round 7

Zambia, 2018

Reference ID

ZMB_2018_AFB-R7_v01_M

Producer(s)

Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Oct 14, 2021

Last modified

Oct 14, 2021

Page views

11974

Downloads

210

Q80e_ZAM. Free and fairness of electoral campaign: candidate ability to hold rallies (Q80E_ZAM)

Data file: zam_r7_data.sav

Overview

Valid: 1200

Invalid: -

Minimum: 1

Maximum: 9

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 981

End: 982

Width: 2

Range: 1 - 9

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

80-ZAM. Let’s break down the various parts of the 2016 elections. How free and fair do you think the campaign was in terms of:
- The ability of all candidates and parties to hold rallies?

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-1	Missing	0	0%
1	Not free and fair	225	18.8%
2	Free and fair, but with major problems	189	15.8%
3	Free and fair, but with minor problems	271	22.6%
4	Completely free and fair	445	37.1%
8	Refused	7	0.6%
9	Don’t know	63	5.3%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog