n their project of forging a Moldovan identity that would justify the existence of
the economically distressed Republic of Moldova as an independent state, the officials
search for the symbols commonly used for forging nationhood. As these symbols are the
same or not significantly different from those of the neighbouring Romanian state due to
their common history (same official language, though differently labelled, same tricolor,
similar coat-of-arms), the Moldovan officials perceive Romania as a threat. My analysis
based on anthropological fieldwork pays special attention to the political declarations of
the Moldovan government and questions their capacity of strengthening citizenship in a
country in which ethnic minorities form more than 30% of the population and which
experiences severe economic problems and massive emigration. The analysis draws also
attention to the evolution of NATO and EU borders, which have accelerated the identity
problems of Moldova, which does not wish to follow ‘neither Russian, nor Romanian’
ways.