Home
Microdata Catalog
Citations
Login
Login
Home
/
Central Data Catalog
/
IND_2014_ROER4D_V01_M
Perceptions of Open Educational Resources in India 2014-2015
India
,
2014 - 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
IND_2014_ROER4D_v01_M
Producer(s)
Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D)
Metadata
Documentation in PDF
DDI/XML
JSON
Study website
Created on
Jul 20, 2022
Last modified
Jul 20, 2022
Page views
2605
Downloads
262
Study Description
Data Dictionary
Downloads
Get Microdata
Data files
fpoi-2014-2015-v1
Data file: fpoi-2014-2015-v1
Survey data
Variables:
105
Variables
Respondent_code
Respondent code
ResearchSite
Research site
Gender
Gender
Age
Age
Designation
Designation
Discipline
Discipline
Highest_qualification
Highest educational qualification
Teaching_Experience
Teaching experience
Nature_of_job
Nature of job
Language_1
Common language 1
Language_2
Common language 2
Language_3
Common language 3
Institution
Institution
Status_of_institution
Status of institution
Nature_of_Institution
Nature of institution
No_of_students
No of students
Previous_OER_use
Used OER previously
Previous_OER_contribution
Contributed OER previously
ATOER6
Have knowledge of Intellectual Property Rights to understand OER
ATOER7
Sharing educational resources improves my professional respect
ATOER8
It gives pleasure if someone adopts/adapts my educational resources
ATOER9
Sharing helps me to get feedback
ATOER10
Sharing enhances my personal and organizational reputation
ATOER11
Sharing of educational resources increases my profile amongst peers
ATOER12
OER increases my network and sphere of influence
ATOER13
It is my responsibility to share all educational resources created by me
ATOER15
OER improves my chance of recognition at a global level
ATOER16
Sharing educational materials as OER will encourage others to do so well
ATOER17
Sharing enhances my confidence as I see myself in part of larger community
ATOER18
When others use my OER, it improves my sense of achievement
ATOER19
OER helps to disseminate my ideas
ATOER23
OER promotes collaboration and consortia
ATOER24
I am efficient in ICT skilld to adopt and use OER
ATOER25
I adopt OER for my teaching as they fullfil academic requirements of my students
ATOER26
My own competencies and knowledge towards OER help me to participate or adopt OE
Motivation1
I believe that OER are good for people as it improves their learning.
Motivation2
I try to contribute to OER to give back to society
Motivation3
I like to be involved in peer production of OER
Motivation4
Through OER, I can reach disadvantaged communities
Motivation5
OER will help developing countries increase access to education
Motivation6
Sharing knowledge is a basic academic value
Motivation7
OER caters to innate desire to learn, improve and progress
Motivation8
OER gives me opportunities to learn new things
Motivation9
OER saves my time
Motivation10
OER is less expensive
Motivation11
OER provides access to best materials and teachers
Motivation12
OER increases my self-confidence
Motivation13
Involvement in OER will give me recognition
Motivation14
OER improves professional image
Motivation15
Receiving appropriate credit (such as API scores) will help me uptake OER
Motivation16
I like receiving comments and feedbacks from experts and seniors on OER created
Motivation17
OER provides us opportunities for establishing new partnerships
Motivation18
Technology associated with OER is easy
Motivation19
I know about my Intellectual Property Rights under Creative Commons licenses
Quality1
OER saves time of the teachers
Quality2
OERs brings down the cost of learning materials
Quality3
OERs are free resources available in open license
Quality4
I do not need permission to re-use OER
Quality5
I often use OER which fulfill the pedagogical need of teaching
Quality6
If OERs are appropriate in their content I prefer to use them
Quality7
I prefer to use OER from trustworthy sources
Quality8
Open license of OER enables continuous quality improvement
Quality9
I use trustworthy OER from reputed institutions
Quality10
Lack of peer review of OERs make them susceptible to poor quality
Quality11
OERs assist the developing countries to have quality materials
Quality12
Quality of OER is questionable
Quality13
OER needs localization
barrier1
Lack of understanding of IP licenses, Copyrights and Creative Commons licenses
barrier1_rank
Rank of barrier1
barrier2
Lack of knowledge for using OER in my teaching and learning process
barrier2_rank
Rank of barrier2
barrier3
Lack of recognition and rewards system for developing OER
barrier3_rank
Rank of barrier3
barrier4
Lack of financial resources by institution to invest in OER
barrier4_rank
Rank of barrier4
barrier5
Lack of technological support to resolve my problems
barrier5_rank
Rank of barrier5
barrier6
In-ability to find existing OER on topics of my interest
barrier6_rank
Rank of barrier6
barrier7
Lack of confidence about the quality of my work
barrier7_rank
Rank of barrier7
barrier8
Incompatibility of OER to my university Learning Management System (LMS)
barrier8_rank
Rank of barrier8
barrier9
Difficulty to remix OER for specific users
barrier9_rank
Rank of barrier9
barrier10
Unavailability of OER in native language
barrier10_rank
Rank of barrier10
barrier11
Lack of ICT skills required to create OER
barrier11_rank
Rank of barrier11
barrier12
Lack of Institutional policy on OER
barrier12_rank
Rank of barrier12
barrier13
Non-user friendly OER platforms
barrier13_rank
Rank of barrier13
barrier14
Poor technical infrastructure
barrier14_rank
Rank of barrier14
barrier15
Difficulty in collaboration
barrier15_rank
Rank of barrier15
barrier16
Inadequate bandwidth
barrier16_rank
Rank of barrier16
barrier17
Current workload
barrier17_rank
Rank of barrier17
barrier18
Lack of time
barrier18_rank
Rank of barrier18
barrier19
Any other
barrier19_rank
Rank of barrier19
Total: 105
Back to Catalog