Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015
Malawi, 2014 - 2015
Get MicrodataCreated on
Mar 29, 2019
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
51874
comments (q15_spec)
Data file: r3.cbcc.co_clean_noid
Overview
Valid:
171
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
79
End:
150
Width:
72
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| ALL WENT WELL | |
| ALL WENT WELL, BUT THE SCHOOL NAME IS NTHUNDU NOT CHIDOTHENJODI. | |
| DONE | |
| EXCELLENT | |
| GOOD | |
| GOOD OBSERVATION | |
| IT WAS A GOOD OBSERVATION | |
| IT WAS A NICE OBSERVATION | |
| IT WAS A NICE OBSERVATION. NO TROUBLES AT ALL | |
| IT WAS GOOD | |
| IT WAS GOOD ALTHOUGH IT WAS MUCH ABOUT NATURAL SPEAKING | |
| IT WAS GOOD AND THEY SEEM TO BE WELL ORGANISED | |
| IT WAS GOOD BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE ACTIVITY CORNERS | |
| IT WAS GOOD OBSERVATION THOUGH THERE IS NO CHILDREN'S CORNER AT THE CBCC | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD | |
| IT WAS WELL COMPLETED | |
| IT WAS WELL DONE | |
| NOTES | |
| OBSERVATION WAS GOOD | |
| SUCCESSFUL | |
| SUCCESSFUL BUT THEY DONT HAVE CHILDREN'S CORNER | |
| SUCCESSFUL, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE CHILDREN'S CORNER | |
| SUCCESSFULL | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE | |
| THE CARE GIVER WAS WELL ORGANISED AND IT WAS A GOOD OBSERVATION. | |
| THE CBCC OPERATES UNDER THE TREE | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | |
| THE NAME OF THE CBCC IS NYAMBWA AND NOT NYABWA | |
| THE OBSERVATION WAS DONE GOOD | |
| THE OBSERVATION WAS EXCELLENT | |
| THE OBSERVATION WAS GOOD | |
| THE OBSERVATION WAS GOOD ONLY THAT THEY STARTED LATE | |
| THE OBSERVATION WAS GOOD. | |
| THE OBSERVATION WENT ON WELL | |
| VERY GOOD | |
| WAS FINE | |
| WAS GOOD | |
| WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| WAS WELL COMPLETED WITH NO PROBLEMS | |
| WELL DONE | |
| WELL DONE THOUGH IT WAS RAINING. | |
| WENT ON WELL |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.