Protecting Early Childhood Development Impact Evaluation 2014-2015
Malawi, 2014 - 2015
Get MicrodataCreated on
Mar 29, 2019
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
29601
(csq22a)
Data file: r3.mg.all_noid
Overview
Valid:
1978
Type:
Discrete
Start:
281
End:
428
Width:
148
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| A GOOD INTERVIEW CONDUCTED | |
| A GOOD VISIT | |
| ADMNISTERED SUCCESSFULLY | |
| ADMNISTERED SUCESFULLY | |
| ALEFA'S MUM PASSED AWAY&NOW NEW GUARDIAN IS CECILIA RABSON | |
| BOTH CHILD AND M/G RELOCATED TO SOUTH AFRICA | |
| BRILLIANT | |
| CHILD AND THE M/G NOT KNOWN | |
| CHILD CHANGED SURNAME TO JOHN FROM PASALIYAPA BECAUSE PASALIYAPA IS CHILD'S GRANDPARENTS NAME | |
| CHILD HAS SWOLLEN FEET HENCE NOT ATTENDING SCHOOL SINCE WEDNESDAY | |
| CHILD RESPONDENTS AND MOTHER WENT TO STAY IN MOZAMBIQUE WITH THEIR FATHER FOR A WHILE | |
| CHRISTINA IS NOT CURRENTLY ENROLLED IN SCHOOL BUT SHE WAS ENROLLED LAST ACADEMIC YEAR | |
| COMPLENT | |
| COMPLETED | |
| COMPLETED THE INTERVIEW | |
| COMPLETELY ADMINISTERED | |
| COMPLETLY DONE | |
| CONDUCTED WELL | |
| DONE | |
| DONE WELL | |
| EOPLE DO NOT KNOW WHERE THE MG AND THE CHILD ARE LIVING NOW | |
| EXCELLENT | |
| GOO INTERVIEW | |
| GOOD | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW ,MOTHER WAS INTERACTIVE AND STORY SHARING | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW MOTHER INDICATES THAT CHILD IS MENTALLY BACKWARD | |
| GOOD INTERVIEW PREVIOUS M/G RELOCATED BECAUSE SHE GOT DIVORCED LEAVING HER TWO CHILDREN WITH HER MOTHER WHO IS NOW NEW M/G IN CHARGE OF THE CHILDREN | |
| GOOD ONE | |
| GOOD RESPONDENT | |
| GOOD VISIT | |
| GREAT | |
| GREAT INTERVIEW | |
| GREAT RESPONDENT,VERY UNDERSTANDING | |
| GUADRIAN WAS GOOD AT ANSWERING QUESTIONS | |
| HER CHILD GOES TO ATTEND AFTER-NOON CLASSES AT HER SCHOOL(PART-TIME) DURING SOME DAYS OF THE WEEK | |
| I FAILED TO TRACK THE CHILD BECAUSE OF POOR ROADS ON THE FIRST DAY IT WAS RAINING HEAVLY | |
| I WAS WELCOMED WITH OPEN HAND | |
| INTERVIEW COMPLETED | |
| INTERVIEW WAS A SUCCESS | |
| INTERVIEW WAS ATTENTIVE | |
| INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | |
| INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL | |
| INTERVIEWEE WAS GOOD | |
| INTERVIEWING WAS FINE | |
| INTERVIEWING WAS GOOD MOTHER GUARDIAN PUT MUCH ATTENTION | |
| IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE M/G IS NOT "EPHELO" BUT ETHEL | |
| IT WAS A GOOD INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS A NICE INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS AWERSOME, THE RESPONDENT GAVE TRUTHFUL RESPONSES | |
| IT WAS AWESOME | |
| IT WAS CHALLENGING ,THE MOTHER FOUND MOST QUESTIONS DIFFICULT | |
| IT WAS CONDUCTED WELL | |
| IT WAS GOOD | |
| IT WAS GOOD AND COMPLETLY DONE | |
| IT WAS GOOD INTERVIEW | |
| IT WAS GOOD INTERVIEW, THE MOTHER PAID ATTENTION | |
| IT WAS NICE | |
| IT WAS OK AND FINE | |
| IT WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| IT WAS VERY GOOD | |
| IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED | |
| IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED AND THE RESPONDENT WERE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE | |
| IT WAS WELL DONE AND COMPLETE, THE RESPONDES WERE IN TRUTHFULNESS | |
| JUST GOOD | |
| M/G WAS ACTIVE AND ATTENTIVE | |
| MOTHER GUARDIAN HAD HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING QUESTIONS MAKING IT HARD FOR HER TO GIVE REQUIRED ANSWERS | |
| MOTHER GUARDIAN WAS VERY COOPERATIVE AND FRIENDLY | |
| MOTHER NOW MARRIED WITH ANOTHER MAN OTHER THAN PEMPHEROS DAD HENCE CHANGE OF SURNAME | |
| MOTHER OF THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE INTERVIEW | |
| MOTHER SEEMED MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT HER SON | |
| MOTHER UNDERSTOOD QUESTIONS CLEARLY | |
| MOTHER WAS GOOD | |
| MOTHER WAS GOOD AT ANSWERING AND UNDERSTANDING QUESTIONS | |
| NONE | |
| NOTE | |
| NOTES | |
| OBSERVATION NOT COMPLETED, CHILD WAS SICK | |
| RESPONDENT IS DIVORCED HENCE HOUSEHOLD HEAD IS SELF | |
| RESPONDENT WAS GOOD | |
| SICCESSFUL ONE | |
| SUCCEFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCESFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCESFUL VISIT | |
| SUCCESFULLY DONE | |
| SUCCESSFUL | |
| SUCCESSFUL COMPLETED | |
| SUCCESSFUL DONE | |
| SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCESSFUL ONE | |
| SUCCESSFUL TRACKING | |
| SUCCESSFUL VISIT | |
| SUCCESSFUL, EVERYTHING WAS DONE | |
| SUCCESSFULL | |
| SUCCESSFULL COMPLETED | |
| SUCCESSFULL INTERVIEW | |
| SUCCESSFULLY ADMNISTERED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE ALL RESPONDENTS WERE AVAILABLE | |
| SUCCESSFULLY DONE AND COMPLETE | |
| SUCCESSFULLY TRACKED | |
| SUCCESSFULLY WELL CONDUCTED | |
| SUCCESSFULY DONE | |
| SUCESSFUL | |
| SUCESSFULLY DONE | |
| THE CHILD CHANGED HOUSEDHOLD, HE IS NOW STAYING IN BLANTYRE WITH HIS BIOLOGICAL MOTHER | |
| THE CHILD RESPONDENT AND M/G LEFT TO MOZAMBIQUE PERMANENT | |
| THE CHILD RESPONDENT IS ALWAYS IN AND OUT OF HOSPITAL | |
| THE CHILD'S SUR NAME CHANGED FROM LANDANI TO MPATSIDWA SINCE HE LIVES WITH HER STEP FATHER | |
| THE FATHER PAID FULL ATTENTION THOUGH HE WAS QUEIT | |
| THE FATHER SEPARATED WITH HER MOTHER, SO TOOK NEW WIFE AS M/G FOR THE KID | |
| THE GRAND MOTHER SHOWED INTEREST AND PAYS MUCH ATTENTION | |
| THE GUARDIAN PAID ATTENTION IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| THE GUARDIAN PAID FULL ATTENTION | |
| THE GUARDIAN PAID FULL ATTENTION AND SHOWED INTEREST | |
| THE GUARDIAN SHOWED INTEREST | |
| THE INTERVIEW WA GOOD | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS COMPLETED | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GREAT | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESFUL | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESFULLY DONE | |
| THE INTERVIEW WAS WELL CONDUCTED | |
| THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL | |
| THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL AND THE RESPONDENT WERE INTERACTIVE | |
| THE M/G FOR ALL THE ROUNDS IS NOFE LIKHOMO NOT NAFE AS WAS WRITTEN IN MIDLINE | |
| THE MOTHER ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS WITH CONFIDENCE | |
| THE MOTHER GUARDIAN FOR THE CHILD RESPONDENT IS AWAY TO THE FIELDS FOR 2 DAYS | |
| THE MOTHER GUARDIAN IS IN THE HOSPITAL | |
| THE MOTHER GUARDIAN WAS SO RELUCTANT TO BE GRANTED AN INTERVIEW AT FIRST | |
| THE MOTHER MOVED AWAY | |
| THE MOTHER PAID ATTENTION AND SHOWED INTEREST | |
| THE MOTHER PAID ATTENTION SHE ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS WITH CONFIDENCE | |
| THE MOTHER SHOWED INTEREST | |
| THE MOTHER SHOWED SO UCH INTEREST | |
| THE MOTHER WENT FAR REMAINED CHILD RESPONDENT WITH RELATIVE | |
| THE MOTHER WENT FAR REMAINED WITH A CHILD RESPONDENT AND A RELATIVE | |
| THE PARTICIPANT WAS KEEN TO BE INVOLVED IN THE INTERVIEW | |
| THE RESPONDENT WAS SO EXCITED TO BE INVOLVED IN THE INTERVIEW | |
| THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY UNDERSTANDING ,IT WAS EASY TO COMMUNICATE | |
| THE VISIT WENT WELL AND THE RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE | |
| THE VIST WAS GOOD AND THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| TRACKING SUCCESSFULL | |
| TRANSLATIONS DONE BY CHILD'S SIBLING | |
| UNSUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW | |
| VERY GOOD | |
| VERY SUCCESSFUL | |
| VERY SUCCESSFULL INTERVIEWS | |
| VERY VERY GOOD | |
| WAS EXCELLENT | |
| WAS FINE AND COOL | |
| WAS FINE INTERVIEW | |
| WAS GOOD | |
| WAS GOOD INTERVIEW THE MOTHER ANSWERS THE QUESTION WELL | |
| WAS GREAT | |
| WAS HARD | |
| WAS JUST GREAT | |
| WAS SUCCESSFUL | |
| WE CONDUCTED | |
| WE HACE A NEW M/G BECAUSE THE MOTHER STAYS AT NKHATABAY NOW | |
| WE TRIED TO ASK FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE FAMILY BUT THERE CURRENT LOCATION IS NOT KNOWN | |
| WE TRIED TO ASK MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE FAMILY BUT WHERE THEY ARE RESIDING NOW IS NOT KNOWN | |
| WE TRIED TO LOOK FOR THEM BUT CURRENT LOCATION IS NOT KNOWN | |
| WELL CONDUCTED | |
| WELL CONDUCTED | |
| WELL CUNDUCTED | |
| WELL DONE | |
| WENT WELL |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.