High Frequency Phone Survey 2020-2021
Gambia, 2020 - 2021
Get MicrodataCreated on
Jan 03, 2022
Last modified
Jan 03, 2022
Page views
66096
Downloads
1624
- Data files
- hhroster_wave1.dta
- mktroster.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19_weighted_cleaned_wave1.dta
- income_loss.dta
- s13shockroster.dta
- s13q5.dta
- hhroster_wave2_annonymized.dta
- mktroster_wave2.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave2.dta
- income_loss_wave2.dta
- s3service_wave2.dta
- hhroster_wave3_anonymised.dta
- mktroster_wave3.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave3_cleaned_anonymised.dta
- income_loss_wave3.dta
- s3service_wave3.dta
- hhroster_wave4_anonymised.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave4_anonymised.dta
-
informal
employment_wave4.dta - hhroster_wave5.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave5_anonymised_weighted.dta
- hhroster_wave6.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave6_anonymised_weighted.dta
- hhroster_wave7.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave7_anonymised_weighted.dta
- hhroster_wave8.dta
- mktroster__wave8.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave8_weighted.dta
- income_loss_wave8.dta
- s3service__wave8.dta
- hhroster_anonymised__wave9.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave9_weighted.dta
- income_loss__wave9.dta
- hhroster_anonymised_wave10.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave10_weighted.dta
- income_loss_wave10.dta
8.Before the coronavirus pandemic, what was the main source of sustenance for me (s24q8)
Data file: GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave5_anonymised_weighted.dta
Overview
Valid:
150
Invalid:
1276
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
6
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
663
End:
663
Width:
1
Range:
1 - 6
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
8. Before the coronavirus pandemic, what was the main source of sustenance for members of your household with disability?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Working full-time | 13 |
8.7%
|
| 2 | Working part-time | 7 |
4.7%
|
| 3 | Begged for alms | 1 |
0.7%
|
| 4 | Depended on family/friends support | 98 |
65.3%
|
| 5 | Retiree | 1 |
0.7%
|
| 6 | Not Applicable/Not working -Too young | 30 |
20%
|
| Sysmiss | 1276 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.